Question:
What are the main points of Ashtanga Yoga? Do you have postive or negative experence with Ashtanga Yoga?
My experience with astanga yoga has been very positive overall. Having a definite sequence of asanas to practice gave me needed direction that I found was missing from the other forms of hatha yoga I’d studied. The ujayi breathing and mula bhanda are extremely effective techniques for preforming the asanas with a greater sense of "yoga." They made entering into and out of the postures a more natural, flowing experience. The heat that’s generated by the astanga style allows for greater flexibility, lesser chance of injury, and purifying effects of sweating. Now the down side: One has to have some understanding of proper asana "mechanics" to avoid being hurt by astanga practice. Even the first series is quite challenging, and includes some very advanced asanas. The good news is that every asana in the series can be modified, and so everyone can practice astanga yoga and can progress naturally with more challenging variations on any asana. The bad news is that sometimes the student is overzealous, or thinks that forcing oneself into an asana is the answer. This is where the injuries can occur–but this isn’t the fault of "astanga yoga." Overall, yoga is yoga: asana’s are different from mere exercise by the mindfulness one brings to them. That is what makes yoga happen.
Response:
Anyway, there won’t be any confusions if we refer to Jois’s teachings as "Ashtanga VINYASA Yoga". Tapani T.
Response:
My experience is neutral. I like a lot of things about ashtanga, but it isn’t what I’m drawn to as a daily practice. My natural bliss seems to move slower and out of the series.
Yoga Sutra says, that a posture must be held effortlessly and comfortably for a long time. In my view it doesn’t leave room for fast moves. Of course, one can progress and purify himself using other techniques (Kung Fu approach is a good example) – but I see no justification for attempts to present these different methods as if they were "prescribed" by traditional Yoga. Now, Ashtanga, as was pointed out, means "Eight limbs". Which are Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhiana and [finally] Samadhi. Second and third "limb" fall under Hatha Yoga, last four – under Raja Yoga… As I understand it the benefits come from the flow, the intense pace of the practice can be very cleansing to the body. This in turn clears the way for stronger energy in the more subtle areas.
It may well be. However it sounds more like aerobic and goes contrary to the traditional Yoga approach of low pace. Actually, they did take one concept from the traditional school: when one masters asanas so well that he can hold them for a long time with no discomfort whatsoever, he doesn’t have to rest between the asanas and can "flow" from asana to asana without stop. Now it of course does not mean to "run" through the course of postures… As you can guess, I personally don’t agree with what is now called "Ashtanga Yoga". I can see how such exercise system can be very beneficial (and how one can get hurt practicing it), but in my view it can only be called "Yoga" in the same sense as anything done "properly" is "Yoga", be it self-less work, scientific study, religious devotion, etc. etc… — Regards, Uri <Disclaimer
Response:
…Talk about spitting venom… Sorry about that… Apologies for the unpleasant rant, people… *bows his head, duly humbled* H.
Response:
Way to go,H. My post was worthy of your reply.
Response:
Oh gosh, it’s nothing to fuss about. I dislike the way some people stole the word yoga from the unions.Also the sun and the moon have been complaining for taking their name in vain when I say hatha.Why use it just for yoga when it means so much more? Sorry, this is not even clever sarcasm… The original poster was showing aware politeness, and you reply with this ?
I can’t get upset if anyone uses sarcasm on me, considering how sarcastic I get sometimes. . . .
Poor Patanjali is now so much poorer that Pattabhi Jois "appropriated" his "classical term" as "a brand name".People stealing other people’s ideas and words,people misusing them and/or misunderstanding them completely,people being ignorant of all this wisdom….Tsk,tsk,tsk..what have we come to? Well, you are sarcastic, but I really don’t see your justification in the above passage… There exists the genuine risk of the dilution of difficult and esoteric practices to popularism for a number of reasons, and the supplanting of an existing named tradition by another tradition with a similar or identic name but a simplified manifesto strikes me as being a genuine point, if not *necessarily* a problem… And if you don’t accept the possibility of ‘wisdom’ being lost in this process, then have a good look at the history of religion…
It’s a question we are always facing in this postmodern life when we sincertely want to live by ancient traditions, but inevitably have to adapt them somehow to present conditions — the challenge is to find the modus vivendi that doesn’t compromise the essentials. We cannot recreate the true Vedic society in the circumstances we have to live in; if we tried too hard we would wind up as fundie fanatics and lose all the joy of life. It takes a serious effort of intelligence, and the divine gift of wisdom and grace, to catch that wave, the maximum authenticity of yoga. When we do, we know that the benefits are very real, and life becomes a joy and a pleasure at the same time as we are being serious. Can anyone in the present day attain sat cit ananda as did the Rsis of old? Even if not, we are brought to the yogic path by the inner impulse of our true nature, and we cannot but be true to our Selves. "…but the modern pop culture has no patience for attending to such minutiae of philology. " Of course older/other popular cultures had immense patience and attended to such minutiae! Oh shut up… What did you *want* him to say, then ? ‘Modern pseudo-occultist neomystical drugs + goa-trance showbiz pop culture’ ? You knew exactly what he meant, and you’re making a worthless and pedantic point…
Excuse me; I was the one who was being pedantic. I just wish instead I could be Vedantic.
Other *cultures* did have the patience for attending to such minutiae… That’s enough. I already feel so superior… Clearly you do… I don’t think the original poster did, somehow… You see in others what you have in yourself… + sadly, you’ve made *me* feel superior to you by spitting such unnecessary venom… H., who almost got irritated but then realized it was all maya, anyway… *wry half-chuckle*…
Understood from the beginning, everyone should feel free to dismiss the maya i’m putting out here; that’s why I said it was just a rant anyway. Nothing to get upset about. What the "Power Yoga" folks mean exactly when they say "Astanga" is that the practice is meant to include (and bring us to) all eight limbs of yoga; Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhyana and Samadhi, as the term is used by Patanjali. You may find that the pet peeve of many of those that practice Ashtanga is that people say that the practice, as taught by Sri K. Pattabhi Jois, is different than Ashtanga of Patanjali. Thanks for my chance to also vent. Elladan
Thanks, Elladan, I’m not familiar with this school, so that’s why I asked. I didn’t mean to be obnoxious toward it. So far the only Jois I know of is James Jois.
Response:
I dislike the way some people stole the word yoga from the unions.Also the sun and the moon have been complaining for taking their name in vain when I say hatha.Why use it just for yoga when it means so much more?
Sorry, this is not even clever sarcasm… The original poster was showing aware politeness, and you reply with this ? Poor Patanjali is now so much poorer that Pattabhi Jois "appropriated" his "classical term" as "a brand name".People stealing other people’s ideas and words,people misusing them and/or misunderstanding them completely,people being ignorant of all this wisdom….Tsk,tsk,tsk..what have we come to?
Well, you are sarcastic, but I really don’t see your justification in the above passage… There exists the genuine risk of the dilution of difficult and esoteric practices to popularism for a number of reasons, and the supplanting of an existing named tradition by another tradition with a similar or identic name but a simplified manifesto strikes me as being a genuine point, if not *necessarily* a problem… And if you don’t accept the possibility of ‘wisdom’ being lost in this process, then have a good look at the history of religion… "…but the modern pop culture has no patience for attending to such minutiae of philology. " Of course older/other popular cultures had immense patience and attended to such minutiae!
Oh shut up… What did you *want* him to say, then ? ‘Modern pseudo-occultist neomystical drugs + goa-trance showbiz pop culture’ ? You knew exactly what he meant, and you’re making a worthless and pedantic point… Other *cultures* did have the patience for attending to such minutiae… That’s enough. I already feel so superior…
Clearly you do… I don’t think the original poster did, somehow… You see in others what you have in yourself… + sadly, you’ve made *me* feel superior to you by spitting such unnecessary venom… And don’t forget .."It’s pronounced "ashtanga", of course, "
Well… If you don’t have anything constructive to say, then *emphatically* : shut…*up*. H., who almost got irritated but then realized it was all maya, anyway… *wry half-chuckle*…
Response:
Yohanan, What the "Power Yoga" folks mean exactly when they say "Astanga" is that the practice is meant to include (and bring us to) all eight limbs of yoga; Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhyana and Samadhi, as the term is used by Patanjali. You may find that the pet peeve of many of those that practice Ashtanga is that people say that the practice, as taught by Sri K. Pattabhi Jois, is different than Ashtanga of Patanjali. Thanks for my chance to also vent. Elladan – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Excuse me, this is just a pet peeve of mine, but the one thing I don’t like about "Astanga Yoga" is the way they took the classical term from Patanjali that applies to all of yoga, and appropriated it as just a brand name for their particular variety. Nowadays (thanks to Madonna) you hear a lot of people saying "Astanga", meaning this brand name, and you have to wonder if they even know the original meaning of the term: the eight limbs or practices of Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhyana, Samadhi. I don’t know what the "Power Yoga" folks mean exactly when they say "Astanga". It’s pronounced "ashtanga", of course, because the s and t in it are retroflex Sanskrit letters. The Sanskrit scholars and Indologists write these retroflex letters with dots underneath, but the modern pop culture has no patience for attending to such minutiae of philology. (aSTa means eight in Sanskrit; anga means limb.) There, I kept that rant fairly brief, didn’t I? Thanks for giving me the chance to vent.
Response:
"Excuse me, this is just a pet peeve of mine, but the one thing I don’t like about "Astanga Yoga" is the way they took the classical term from Patanjali that applies to all of yoga, and appropriated it as just a brand name for their particular variety."
I dislike the way some people stole the word yoga from the unions.Also the sun and the moon have been complaining for taking their name in vain when I say hatha.Why use it just for yoga when it means so much more? Poor Patanjali is now so much poorer that Pattabhi Jois "appropriated" his "classical term" as "a brand name".People stealing other people’s ideas and words,people misusing them and/or misunderstanding them completely,people being ignorant of all this wisdom….Tsk,tsk,tsk..what have we come to? "…but the modern pop culture has no patience for attending to such minutiae of philology. "
Of course older/other popular cultures had immense patience and attended to such minutiae! Once everybody new about "retroflex Sanskrit letters" but now we are inundated by those stupid Madonna (Oh what hubris in a name) fans that can’t tell pratyahara from sahara. That’s enough. I already feel so superior I am now going to practice viparita salabhasana for a couple of hours. And don’t forget .."It’s pronounced "ashtanga", of course, "
Response:
Excuse me, this is just a pet peeve of mine, but the one thing I don’t like about "Astanga Yoga" is the way they took the classical term from Patanjali that applies to all of yoga, and appropriated it as just a brand name for their particular variety. Nowadays (thanks to Madonna) you hear a lot of people saying "Astanga", meaning this brand name, and you have to wonder if they even know the original meaning of the term: the eight limbs or practices of Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhyana, Samadhi. I don’t know what the "Power Yoga" folks mean exactly when they say "Astanga". It’s pronounced "ashtanga", of course, because the s and t in it are retroflex Sanskrit letters. The Sanskrit scholars and Indologists write these retroflex letters with dots underneath, but the modern pop culture has no patience for attending to such minutiae of philology. (aSTa means eight in Sanskrit; anga means limb.) There, I kept that rant fairly brief, didn’t I? Thanks for giving me the chance to vent.
Response:
My experience is neutral. I like a lot of things about ashtanga, but it isn’t what I’m drawn to as a daily practice. My natural bliss seems to move slower and out of the series. As I understand it the benefits come from the flow, the intense pace of the practice can be very cleansing to the body. This in turn clears the way for stronger energy in the more subtle areas. peace, sandra
Response:
What are the main points of Ashtanga Yoga? Do you have postive or negative experence with Ashtanga Yoga?
Hi Stefan, The main points of Ashtanga Yoga are: 1) The breath. Ujjayi breathing is used during the practice. It is an audible breath that serves also to focus the mind. It is also designed to create heat and to increase the lungs. 2) The bandas. The bandas, or locks, are engaged during the practice. The uddiyana banda lifts about two inches below the navel. The mula banda is lifting up of the perineum. Engaging these bandas during the practice takes added concentration and creates lightness and strength in the body. 3) The vinyasa. Vinyasa (or flow) links the postures together into one continuous form. It keeps the heat up and helps to neutralize the body between postures. This flow of postures is what really distinguishes Ashtanga from other styles of hatha yoga. The main focus of Ashtanga is not the postures themselves but the breath, the bandas and the vinyasas. I have had very positive experiences with Ashtanga. I am not sure I would be still practicing yoga if I had not begun to learn Ashtanga. Not really any negative ones. The one caution though is that because it is always moving there is a tendency to go to far in the postures and I have heard of more injuries in this style of practice than others. As with any hatha yoga you need to bring intelligence with you to the practice and learn to really listen to the body so not to hurt yourself. I have also noticed that generally, those who have studied Iyengar do not take to Ashtanga much, (why are they moving so fast?) and that those who study Ashtanga do not take to Iyengar much, (they are not moving fast enough to generate much heat). This is a very simplified explanation, but I hope it helps. Namaste, Elladan
Response:
What are the main points of Ashtanga Yoga? Do you have postive or negative experence with Ashtanga Yoga?
Response: