Posts belonging to Category 'Surya Namaskar'

Expectations

Question:

Intent precedes Thought Absolutely! Thanks for your thoughtful consideration of and response to my post. I agree with you in totality.

After painful experience, I have learnt that whatever  I write that is balanced and truthful, is not mine.  Truth simply exists.  It does not belong to anyone.  Wisdom simply exists.  Only the mistakes and typos are mine! :-) Namaste

– Intent precedes Thought

Response:

Shahin, I find your reaction to omjaroo insipid and lacking in substance.

Based on your response to my post I can certainly understand the tenor of your statement. My (pleasant) experience has been with Shahin, that at first he seems to react to other’s posts emotionally and then after some inquiry and thought he tempers his initial reaction with a very grounded (perhaps religious, perhaps philosophical) reasoning which for me often hits the mark. To me the important thing is he is honest in his reactions and in his reflection. I personally appreciate that. Besides I don’t think his training and experience are akin to yours or mine and this might account for his particular "take" on things. It would seem he has concentrated on cultivating beauty, symmetry and perfection. The opposite side of the same stick might very likely provoke an uncomfortable reaction in him. As I read your contributions as well as those of others recently, I am thinking we have the makings of a good solid (great and fun) exchange of knowledge, experience and perspective, if we can only surmount the fear of sharing who we are, what we think and where we’ve been. I’m looking forward to it :-) Thanks again. Jared Namaste

Response:

Admire and revere Jesus Christ, Gandhi? Then try living like them for even five minutes a day. These were both fighters and irreverent as hell. Don’t bother praying to or admiring Mother Theresa, try putting others before yourself.

Absolutely.  But it is also good to put oneself before others – to judge and to correct oneself before trying to teach others – "fix yourself before you fix others".  Or "Doctor, heal thyself" Now that’s real reverence. Try living in the piss and shit she did. Draw a dying, pus soaked body to you and comfort and still someone’s fear.

Everything that one turns away from – the hunger, the suffering, the poverty, and the PAIN of others, will one day come back to us.  Every aspect of reality that we try to ignore, we will one day experience. To progress in yoga, one has to expand one’s awareness.  And that means, coming to terms with all that exists, to face up to every distasteful and abhorrent thing that is in existence. Don’t talk to me about reverence. It means shit… God’s Love, Jared PS. Think I am afraid of being punished for what I’ve said?  Not even. Karma? Bring it on! I’ve said a lot worse and really did mean it. Besides, reverent or not, casual or not, God does and always has blessed me. And I thank God for this. Namaste

– Intent precedes Thought

Response:

Shahin, I find your reaction to omjaroo insipid and lacking in substance. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Omjaroo I find your reaction very disappointing. Shahin "omjaroo" wrote Wade, Somewhere along the line I got the impression that you have little use for or understanding of anything I have to convey. I can’t remember the last time you had anything positive or especially constructive to say to me. I do however remember you launching into me when you thought that I was at a disadvantage in that cross posted thread on siddhis. I have the distinct impression that you have never once understood what I have posted from the very first post you ever replied to. I mean really, do a search on your nic and mine and tell me we have ever been even close to one mind. Mostly I have the impression that you are self rigorous and condescending; judge what I say and then accuse me of doing the very same thing. But having said that, as long as you respond to my posts, I will continue to respond to yours until you ask me not to or until I get the impression you are simply trolling for a response. I have in the past been accused of being a bit goody two shoes, or Polly Anna like in my view of the world. E.g., there’s only God and God is Good, so only Good exists, etc. So just for a change of pace I’ll step out of my roll of saint like optimist and respond in a manner I have a bit more experience and facility with. It’s about the sacred and the profane, and the level of reverence. Wasn’t there a book, poem or quote to this effect?  Really, I make a point of giving others credit when I use their words. The casual use of the word "God" Would you be suggesting that I use the word God casually? I have never used the word God casually in my life. Even when I say God Damn it, I am still aware that I am speaking God’s name You might notice I always capitalize  the word God. You’ll also notice anytime I refer to an attribute of God I also capitalize it. This is a form of Bhakti practice for me and not meant for your consumption but if you paid the least attention to what I write you might notice it. is like a tourist going into a temple and prattling on, comparing his personal beliefs, Would you be suggesting I prattle?  Surely you’ve noticed some deliberateness in what I say and how I say it? while the real worshippers inside are silently going about their reverential worship. "God" is a very sacred area for many people. There is a reason that many religions do not utter the name of their "God", it is considered profane. Boy, not saying God because it’s considered profane. Now that has to my my definition  of: completely stupid and idiotic beyond belief. Are there really such people? Then I grieve for them and offer this prayer: God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God. You know what? Fuck God, fuck God in his ass. And Buddha, Gandhi, Jesus and Mother Theresa to boot. The Pope, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King, Babaji. Who else would you like on the list? Fuck them all and fuck Omjaroo too. Worship  means nothing. Reverence is nothing more then ass kissing cowardice and hypocrisy. Do you suppose for a second that any of these people want you, me or anyone else to worship them? Holy crap! It’s all bullshit and they would be the first ones to tell you as much. You want to talk to me about reverence? I know what real reverence it. It is when you stop begging (admiring, worshiping) the great and noble people of history like they could do something for you and start living your life like they did. You want to have reverence for God, then tell and live in the Truth and in  Love; express Intelligence ; live by Principle and revere Life. Because God is Life, Love, Truth, Intelligence, Soul, Principle and Spirit. Admire and revere Jesus Christ, Gandhi? Then try living like them for even five minutes a day. These were both fighters and irreverent as hell. Don’t bother praying to or admiring Mother Theresa, try putting others before yourself. Now that’s real reverence. Try living in the piss and shit she did. Draw a dying, pus soaked body to you and comfort and still someone’s fear. Don’t talk to me about reverence. It means shit… God’s Love, Jared PS. Think I am afraid of being punished for what I’ve said?  Not even. Karma? Bring it on! I’ve said a lot worse and really did mean it. Besides, reverent or not, casual or not, God does and always has blessed me. And I thank God for this. Namaste

– Intent precedes Thought

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Shahin, I find your reaction to omjaroo insipid and lacking in substance. Based on your response to my post I can certainly understand the tenor of your statement. My (pleasant) experience has been with Shahin, that at first he seems to react to other’s posts emotionally and then after some inquiry and thought he tempers his initial reaction with a very grounded (perhaps religious, perhaps philosophical) reasoning which for me often hits the mark. To me the important thing is he is honest in his reactions and in his reflection. I personally appreciate that. Besides I don’t think his training and experience are akin to yours or mine and this might account for his particular "take" on things. It would seem he has concentrated on cultivating beauty, symmetry and perfection. The opposite side of the same stick might very likely provoke an uncomfortable reaction in him.

A yogi should always try to be a realist and see things as they really are.  Throw away the rose-coloured glasses as well as the dark shades. As I read your contributions as well as those of others recently, I am thinking we have the makings of a good solid (great and fun) exchange of knowledge, experience and perspective,

Perhaps.. But i try never to think of the future.. who knows what the future may hold?  it is in this present moment that the future is decided. if we can only surmount the fear of sharing who we are, what we think and where we’ve been. I’m looking forward to it :-) Thanks again. Jared Namaste

– Intent precedes Thought

Response:

mental and emotional states are inter-dependent.  We cannot change one without simultaneously affecting the others.  

This has been my understanding, all 8 limbs of yoga are to be developed in parallel.  They are not a system of steps. I liken them to a circuit where any excess resistance in any of the parts will create a burnout and a system wide malfunction.  Weakest link and all that. Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Dhyana, Samadhi all improved in sychronized harmony.  In my mind’s eye it is a shimmering and undulating ring of eight segments.  Its shape determined by one’s current state. Wade

Response:

Omjaroo I find your reaction very disappointing. Shahin

Why? I was personaly responding (as opposed to reacting)  to Wade and I did post a warning. Namaste

Response:

Sorry you feel this way.  I will from now on stop responding to your posts and stay out of your way. Wade

Response:

Intent precedes Thought

Absolutely! Thanks for your thoughtful consideration of and response to my post. I agree with you in totality. Namaste

Response:

You want to have reverence for God, then tell and live in the Truth and in  Love; express Intelligence ; live by Principle and revere Life. Because God is Life, Love, Truth, Intelligence, Soul, Principle and Spirit. Admire and revere Jesus Christ, Gandhi? Then try living like them for even five minutes a day. These were both fighters and irreverent as hell. Don’t bother praying to or admiring Mother Theresa, try putting others before yourself. Now that’s real reverence. Try living in the piss and shit she did. Draw a dying, pus soaked body to you and comfort and still someone’s fear.

While it is true that as one’s awareness expands, one has to come to terms with all the suffering and want that exists in the world, relying solely on this approach does not help.  It is necessary to understand that the same incarnated soul (jeeva) that is, in one lifetime, experiencing pain and suffering, will be experiencing something completely different in the afterlife.  Gone will be the physical suffering, pain, hunger and anguish.  Only the lessons learnt will remain.  Thus, knowing that change is the only constant, it is not proper to feel pity or sorrow for others.  One must have compassion, and be guided by that.  If one finds the opportunity to help others, one must do so.  Failing that, one must not indulge in wasteful feelings of pity.  Pity has absolutely no value but to weaken the experiencer.  We are not here to ’save the world’.  We are here to save ourselves. Moderation saves us from pain.  To feel sorrow or pity is to go to a dualistic illusionary extreme and hence, a cause of pain. — Intent precedes Thought

Response:

All the work (jhana, karma, bhakti, recovery ) I have managed has gotten me to the point where I am nearly ready and able to start hatha, pranayama and meditation in earnest. However I am beginning to think it is my bad habits and attachments which keep me here in this world. I feel as if, were I able to remove the interference created by body, mind and soul, that I would disappear (melt) into Love (the void.)

omjaroo, everyone has their own path to follow based on their individual perception and experience.  Let me offer my opinion, for what it’s worth, based on my experience: one does not have to wait to start pranayama or meditation.  I did not really expect to begin doing meditation, or even to be able to meditate.  Yet my practicing of meditation and occasional surya namaskar early in the morning started to take effect.  I quit smoking without even planning to.  Meditation and pranayama have some unknown effect which realigns us in profound ways.  I belive that exercise/hatha yoga, pranayama, meditation and pure selfless intent (bodhi) are synergistic, just like the physical, mental and emotional states are inter-dependent.  We cannot change one without simultaneously affecting the others.   — Intent precedes Thought

Response:

Omjaroo I find your reaction very disappointing. Shahin "omjaroo" wrote – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Wade, Somewhere along the line I got the impression that you have little use for or understanding of anything I have to convey. I can’t remember the last time you had anything positive or especially constructive to say to me. I do however remember you launching into me when you thought that I was at a disadvantage in that cross posted thread on siddhis. I have the distinct impression that you have never once understood what I have posted from the very first post you ever replied to. I mean really, do a search on your nic and mine and tell me we have ever been even close to one mind. Mostly I have the impression that you are self rigorous and condescending; judge what I say and then accuse me of doing the very same thing. But having said that, as long as you respond to my posts, I will continue to respond to yours until you ask me not to or until I get the impression you are simply trolling for a response. I have in the past been accused of being a bit goody two shoes, or Polly Anna like in my view of the world. E.g., there’s only God and God is Good, so only Good exists, etc. So just for a change of pace I’ll step out of my roll of saint like optimist and respond in a manner I have a bit more experience and facility with. It’s about the sacred and the profane, and the level of reverence. Wasn’t there a book, poem or quote to this effect?  Really, I make a point of giving others credit when I use their words. The casual use of the word "God" Would you be suggesting that I use the word God casually? I have never used the word God casually in my life. Even when I say God Damn it, I am still aware that I am speaking God’s name You might notice I always capitalize  the word God. You’ll also notice anytime I refer to an attribute of God I also capitalize it. This is a form of Bhakti practice for me and not meant for your consumption but if you paid the least attention to what I write you might notice it. is like a tourist going into a temple and prattling on, comparing his personal beliefs, Would you be suggesting I prattle?  Surely you’ve noticed some deliberateness in what I say and how I say it? while the real worshippers inside are silently going about their

reverential worship. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "God" is a very sacred area for many people. There is a reason that many religions do not utter the name of their "God", it is considered profane. Boy, not saying God because it’s considered profane. Now that has to my my definition  of: completely stupid and idiotic beyond belief. Are there really such people? Then I grieve for them and offer this prayer: God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God. You know what? Fuck God, fuck God in his ass. And Buddha, Gandhi, Jesus and Mother Theresa to boot. The Pope, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King, Babaji. Who else would you like on the list? Fuck them all and fuck Omjaroo too. Worship  means nothing. Reverence is nothing more then ass kissing cowardice and hypocrisy. Do you suppose for a second that any of these people want you, me or anyone else to worship them? Holy crap! It’s all bullshit and they would be the first ones to tell you as much. You want to talk to me about reverence? I know what real reverence it. It is when you stop begging (admiring, worshiping) the great and noble people of history like they could do something for you and start living your life like they did. You want to have reverence for God, then tell and live in the Truth and in  Love; express Intelligence ; live by Principle and revere Life. Because God is Life, Love, Truth, Intelligence, Soul, Principle and Spirit. Admire and revere Jesus Christ, Gandhi? Then try living like them for even five minutes a day. These were both fighters and irreverent as hell. Don’t bother praying to or admiring Mother Theresa, try putting others before yourself. Now that’s real reverence. Try living in the piss and shit she did. Draw a dying, pus soaked body to you and comfort and still someone’s fear. Don’t talk to me about reverence. It means shit… God’s Love, Jared PS. Think I am afraid of being punished for what I’ve said?  Not even. Karma? Bring it on! I’ve said a lot worse and really did mean it. Besides, reverent or not, casual or not, God does and always has blessed me. And I thank God for this. Namaste

Response:

Wade, Somewhere along the line I got the impression that you have little use for or understanding of anything I have to convey. I can’t remember the last time you had anything positive or especially constructive to say to me. I do however remember you launching into me when you thought that I was at a disadvantage in that cross posted thread on siddhis. I have the distinct impression that you have never once understood what I have posted from the very first post you ever replied to. I mean really, do a search on your nic and mine and tell me we have ever been even close to one mind. Mostly I have the impression that you are self rigorous and condescending; judge what I say and then accuse me of doing the very same thing. But having said that, as long as you respond to my posts, I will continue to respond to yours until you ask me not to or until I get the impression you are simply trolling for a response. I have in the past been accused of being a bit goody two shoes, or Polly Anna like in my view of the world. E.g., there’s only God and God is Good, so only Good exists, etc. So just for a change of pace I’ll step out of my roll of saint like optimist and respond in a manner I have a bit more experience and facility with. It’s about the sacred and the profane, and the level of reverence.

Wasn’t there a book, poem or quote to this effect?  Really, I make a point of giving others credit when I use their words. The casual use of the word "God"

Would you be suggesting that I use the word God casually? I have never used the word God casually in my life. Even when I say God Damn it, I am still aware that I am speaking God’s name You might notice I always capitalize  the word God. You’ll also notice anytime I refer to an attribute of God I also capitalize it. This is a form of Bhakti practice for me and not meant for your consumption but if you paid the least attention to what I write you might notice it. is like a tourist going into a temple and prattling on, comparing his personal beliefs,

Would you be suggesting I prattle?  Surely you’ve noticed some deliberateness in what I say and how I say it? while the real worshippers inside are silently going about their reverential worship.   "God" is a very sacred area for many people. There is a reason that many religions do not utter the name of their "God", it is considered profane.

Boy, not saying God because it’s considered profane. Now that has to my my definition  of: completely stupid and idiotic beyond belief. Are there really such people? Then I grieve for them and offer this prayer: God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God. You know what? Fuck God, fuck God in his ass. And Buddha, Gandhi, Jesus and Mother Theresa to boot. The Pope, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King, Babaji. Who else would you like on the list? Fuck them all and fuck Omjaroo too. Worship  means nothing. Reverence is nothing more then ass kissing cowardice and hypocrisy. Do you suppose for a second that any of these people want you, me or anyone else to worship them? Holy crap! It’s all bullshit and they would be the first ones to tell you as much. You want to talk to me about reverence? I know what real reverence it. It is when you stop begging (admiring, worshiping) the great and noble people of history like they could do something for you and start living your life like they did. You want to have reverence for God, then tell and live in the Truth and in  Love; express Intelligence ; live by Principle and revere Life. Because God is Life, Love, Truth, Intelligence, Soul, Principle and Spirit. Admire and revere Jesus Christ, Gandhi? Then try living like them for even five minutes a day. These were both fighters and irreverent as hell. Don’t bother praying to or admiring Mother Theresa, try putting others before yourself. Now that’s real reverence. Try living in the piss and shit she did. Draw a dying, pus soaked body to you and comfort and still someone’s fear. Don’t talk to me about reverence. It means shit… God’s Love, Jared PS. Think I am afraid of being punished for what I’ve said?  Not even. Karma? Bring it on! I’ve said a lot worse and really did mean it. Besides, reverent or not, casual or not, God does and always has blessed me. And I thank God for this. Namaste

Response:

Jared, It’s about the sacred and the profane, and the level of reverence. The casual use of the word "God" is like a tourist going into a temple and prattling on, comparing his personal beliefs, while the real worshippers inside are silently going about their reverential worship.  "God" is a very sacred area for many people. There is a reason that many religions do not utter the name of their "God", it is considered profane.  It is not that Shahin is an aetheist, its because he has a deeply sacred sensibility. Wade

Response:

Shahin, My apologies for the delayed response but I am in the process moving from my home. Since I don’t know exactly where I am going  (the kids can go to mom’s full time), there are numerous arrangements, accommodations and details to take care of and little time to do it. Please forgive my brevity. Perhaps after things settle down I can respond as I want and in the manor your posts deserve. I think Stu’s finest contribution was facilitating this process of "getting to know you". And you generously abided, Jared. I’ll try to do the same.

Thanks Thank you for sharing part of your life experience, and the pains that you have been bearing while forging a rich character, evident from the way you express yourself.

Your welcome. And thank you for the kind words. This exchange, in my view, has been more enriching for me than our previous one. Broad  general knowledge has been a feature of my personal culture since childhood. But experiential knowledge is something else. That probably explains my reaction: believing that  experiential knowledge has more value than  *blind faith* often vested in "half-understood" ideas about G%*?d, or philosophical and scientific theories. Yoga, in its broadest teachings, seems to me about the most extraordinary of disciplines in human heritage to satisfy my need for THAT kind of understanding, when it comes to self-knowledge. So, my fellow classmate, thank you for being an edifying means in my growingly integrated education. :)

For me also and I couldn’t agree more. Personal experience is far more valuable to me then books full of text and commentaries.   Please don’t tell me who or what you think I am, or quote me what someone else says, share with me who you are, what worked, what didn’t, where you’re going and where you’ve been. How do you think, feel and live. This is valuable and worth listening to and investing thought in the review and a response. The other is important but it is everywhere. Non-presentation, forthrightness and honesty are as rare as hen’s teeth ;-) I still maintain, and indeed am convinced that the _idea_ of "God" is nothing more than a facilitator in leading to a higher state of understanding, where words a attributes lose their sense and application. The realm of unmanifest. The ineffable. The realised. I have been struggling with this with a feeling of frustration for a long time, and only recently have begun to walk past this obstacle, which is naught but yet another illusion.

I agree and I think this is very true, but I’ve also come to believe that God can be known here and now. How do you spell paradox? I think perhaps it is the difference between trying to see the source (impossible) and the expression of the source (doable) I’ve spent fifteen years contemplating and trying to grasp the meaning of Everything, Is and Of and As God. I’ve only recently begun to share (alt.yoga) what I have learned. As you can see the words I use to communicate what my experience and knowledge are hopelessly inadequate and what others hear and see is trite, offensive and irreverent :-) I have tried posting my understanding in poems that I wrote but even these have generally been ignored or dismissed. I can see why every time Jesus opened his mouth someone wanted to stone him to death. Words spoken without a context can not communicate. This is why the words along with personal meaning and context are more valuable to me. Here is one for yoga: S**t happens in forward bend! In chapter fifteen (15.14) Krishna says he is in Prana and Apana, and is involved in the digestion process.  :) I’d say "God" is also in our species’ unique quality of sense of humour.

That is truly inspired :-) )))  You and Hari Har Singh definitely have the gift! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have to go and give my son a lift, and sorry I am writing this in a rush. Have a couple myself, they can be less then understanding and patient sometimes :-) I have two sons. My older one is now a young independent man; a university student. The 14 years old one is my now personal friend. Earlier in the week I had to go and help to rescue his Christmas present which was stuck 30 meters high, up a tall tree in a field: a radio controlled plane, which he partly financed himself from his wages form a job as a trainee hospitality manager: a waiter :) for one of my clients for whom I recently finished a restaurant. He is a lovely lad who appeals to the childlike aspects of me which is playful and curious … a quality that has kept me young, heart and body.  We spent today together repairing the plane, cooking, and swimming –

What a delightful sharing, thanks. I might not be alive today but for the birth of my daughter 22 years ago. It was at that moment as I looked at her that I felt (small as it was) I had a reason to live. A responsibility to pull myself out of the shit hole (mentally, spiritually and physically) I was in, in order to protect and nurture this little being. While I would eventually miss a great deal of my daughter’s growing up (we are still estranged) I can now occasionally feel joy in watching my son’s (12 & 14) as they grow. I do most of my asanas and my pranayama exercises during my swimming session (every evening for one and a half hours). I have been doing this for over twenty years, regularly. I am a masters swimmer at competitive level, fit and strong, with the kind of physique that most yoga aspirants aim for: lean, defined and supple, and still improving. I am 50, happily divorced, currently a practicing celibate, and enjoying it.

All the work (jhana, karma, bhakti, recovery ) I have managed has gotten me to the point where I am nearly ready and able to start hatha, pranayama and meditation in earnest. However I am beginning to think it is my bad habits and attachments which keep me here in this world. I feel as if, were I able to remove the interference created by body, mind and soul, that I would disappear (melt) into Love (the void.) My Pilates teacher, in a dialogue last week, told me that I am a very lucky man (not for my physique, of course:), for something else we were talking about …  I have a talent for making people successful through the use of the tools of my profession – I am a management consultant as well as a commercial interior designer and project manager). I work independently, because I *can’t* have a boss, it’s not in the nature – including a strong character English wife :) with whom I still maintain friendly relationship, albeit living in two "independent" households. It’s been a challenge, as well as great blessing … "Freedom and independence" to all mankind in all the forms that suite their nature.  :)

Understood. I can relate.   I had never considered myself lucky until now, because of the challenges involved in my way of life. So, this year, amongst my other resolutions, I will be mindful and grateful for my good fortunes, and most of all, I would wish you good fortune in great abundance as you grow into that which your nature wants you to be.

There is no luck, no mistakes, no advantages or capriciousness in the Universe. If you could see all the equations the math would be perfect. Can’t wait until the quantum physicists catch up to Einstein’s unified field theory. That will be fun. I think it will be the atheists who finally proof there is God. In the mean time I too am ever more grateful for what I have and I wish it and all the best for you and yours. Love, Shahin

As well, Jared Namaste

Response:

I think Stu’s finest contribution was facilitating this process of "getting to know you".

And you generously abided, Jared. I’ll try to do the same. Thank you for sharing part of your life experience, and the pains that you have been bearing while forging a rich character, evident from the way you express yourself. This exchange, in my view, has been more enriching for me than our previous one. Broad  general knowledge has been a feature of my personal culture since childhood. But experiential knowledge is something else. That probably explains my reaction: believing that  experiential knowledge has more value than  *blind faith* often vested in "half-understood" ideas about G%*?d, or philosophical and scientific theories. Yoga, in its broadest teachings, seems to me about the most extraordinary of disciplines in human heritage to satisfy my need for THAT kind of understanding, when it comes to self-knowledge. So, my fellow classmate, thank you for being an edifying means in my growingly integrated education. :) I still maintain, and indeed am convinced that the _idea_ of "God" is nothing more than a facilitator in leading to a higher state of understanding, where words a attributes lose their sense and application. The realm of unmanifest. The ineffable. The realised. I have been struggling with this with a feeling of frustration for a long time, and only recently have begun to walk past this obstacle, which is naught but yet another illusion. In the Gita’s metaphor, Krishna’s avatar speaks of his "maya" state (the manifest; Maya means illusion. In Persian, a language related to Sanskrit, maya means: "matter"; "means"; "tool"; "potential"), when he takes on *forms* such as other deities, material existence, humans, mind, language and so on. He who can find God in digestive activities in as much measure as in heavens must be an enlightened one :)  which reminds me of your recent humorous post. Here is one for yoga: S**t happens in forward bend! In chapter fifteen (15.14) Krishna says he is in Prana and Apana, and is involved in the digestion process.  :) I’d say "God" is also in our species’ unique quality of sense of humour. I have to go and give my son a lift, and sorry I am writing this in a rush. Have a couple myself, they can be less then understanding and patient sometimes :-)

I have two sons. My older one is now a young independent man; a university student. The 14 years old one is my now personal friend. Earlier in the week I had to go and help to rescue his Christmas present which was stuck 30 meters high, up a tall tree in a field: a radio controlled plane, which he partly financed himself from his wages form a job as a trainee hospitality manager: a waiter :) for one of my clients for whom I recently finished a restaurant. He is a lovely lad who appeals to the childlike aspects of me which is playful and curious … a quality that has kept me young, heart and body.  We spent today together repairing the plane, cooking, and swimming – I do most of my asanas and my pranayama exercises during my swimming session (every evening for one and a half hours). I have been doing this for over twenty years, regularly. I am a masters swimmer at competitive level, fit and strong, with the kind of physique that most yoga aspirants aim for: lean, defined and supple, and still improving. I am 50, happily divorced, currently a practicing celibate, and enjoying it. My Pilates teacher, in a dialogue last week, told me that I am a very lucky man (not for my physique, of course:), for something else we were talking about …  I have a talent for making people successful through the use of the tools of my profession – I am a management consultant as well as a commercial interior designer and project manager). I work independently, because I *can’t* have a boss, it’s not in the nature – including a strong character English wife :) with whom I still maintain friendly relationship, albeit living in two "independent" households. It’s been a challenge, as well as great blessing … "Freedom and independence" to all mankind in all the forms that suite their nature.  :) I had never considered myself lucky until now, because of the challenges involved in my way of life. So, this year, amongst my other resolutions, I will be mindful and grateful for my good fortunes, and most of all, I would wish you good fortune in great abundance as you grow into that which your nature wants you to be. Love, Shahin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Namaste

Response:

Stu, Compassion dictates that we understand the "truth" inside both these points of view.

Thanks for the assist. ;-) Namaste

Response:

Shahin, Hi, I am glad to get your response. I appreciate your thoughfulness and effort in posting. Dear Omjaroo I realise that my reaction to you was harsh, and hope that I didn’t hurt your feelings.

I am ever reminded that we often can’t hear what others are saying unless it is what we want to hear. Unless it conforms to and can pass through our internal filters somewhat intact. Of course you did not hurt my feelings. You don’t have that power. Only I can so that and in this case I didn’t feel a need to. I was however surprised (silly me, although I have to admit it is a pleasure to recognize I have some measure of vulnerability). Along with my initial emotional processing of your (Dad’s – gee what did I do wrong, why am I not good enough, etc.) rebuke I was at once thrilled and gratified that an individual would honestly share their thoughts about me, with me and others. I have been criticized by others for violating their personal sensibilities but I sensed a certain honesty and forthrightness in yours. Then I did a google search and found out why I recognized your name and style. Reactions to my words are an issue on the receiving end. I have no power to offend, hurt feeling, irritate, spark outrage or resentment (or save, make feel good, ease pain, etc). Any feelings or thoughts generated by the reading of my words are created by and belong to the person reading them. This to me is common sense. The only power I have (woefully less then I would like) is to express who I am, how I think, what I feel as honestly as I can. A favorite quote from Emilio Zola says, the purpose of my art is to life my life out loud. And this is what I aspire to because it is what I fear most. As an artist I am sure you realize there is no accounting for taste. I figured out (intellectually; emotionally I am just catching up) some time ago that it doesn’t matter what anyone thinks. That I am the one accountable for my thoughts, actions and their consequences. To thy own self be true, said some smart guy awhile back and I believe  it. After all I am the only one who knows what is true about me and what the whole story is. I learned this lesson in the most graphic terms as I stood in front of a judge listening to all the things I supposedly did and all the reasons I did them. All inaccurate and utterly false (but they sounded plausible). To all concerned this was undoubtedly the truth, how could it not be? Fortunately after hearing my side the judge felt there were possibly two good explanations for the circumstance and this created a reasonable doubt in his mind so the traffic ticket was dropped. It was a strange (and ugly) feeling, knowing what the truth was and listening to an attack being made on me which was completely false, yet true in the perception of the professional policeman. A similar situation would play out years later as I stood in another court (we are a very legalistic society here in the U.S.) and listened to an attack on me with lies and fabrications  being made for financial motive. This time the stakes were higher and I was facing county jail time. Same story. I knew what was true and why the people accusing me were lying. In this case the State (district attorney, whose job was to put me in jail) stepped in on my behalf and resolved the matter without prejudice to me. Simply amazing!   Again six years later I would stand in another court (hey is there a pattern here?) in an attempt to protect myself and my children from an abusive spouse and listen to a litany of lies, fabrications, hatred, fear and emotional (and social) manipulation. The only way I could have defended myself was to attack my wife. I was unwilling to do that so this time around I stood nearly silent. This would continue for another 5-6 hearings. And in fact continues to this day. Same lies, same social sanctions and ignorance, same options to hurt my wife to protect myself.   In my life the only real effective strategy  has been to tell the truth and stay with that because. What passes for the truth in the eyes of others is all to  often whatever they want it to be. As you have mentioned above, we have had a pleasant exchange of views in the past, and I hold you to be a very nice fellow.

Thank you for saying so. The feeling is mutual. I think you will find the answer to most of your questions above in my recent posts.

I have the most rudimentary Usenet service and they drop threads fairly quickly. I wasn’t following your thread with Wade but I did find and read it on google. I understand. What’s interesting is that your views on religion seem to be remarkably similar to mine. I personally have little use for it. Stu said something about bible quotes and recently I was deemed a religious zealot in another thread. Whew. Preaching, zealot, bible thumper all because I use the word God. I don’t think I have ever posted or referred to the practice of any religion. I can quote from the Gita, the upanishads, the vedas and any number or religious texts, some well know, others obscure. I just quoted from the bible because it is a well known reference and I happen to be currently taking lessons in it. I guess I should assume some sensitivity around Christianity by other religious and cultural followers. The Christians have a reputation for aggressively preaching. Stu has also made a perceptive contribution to this discussion.

Yes he has and I sense they were motivated by a desire to be helpful and I appreciate them. At the moment I could only make time to reply to Wade, since I have to go and pay attention to my family members and my other duties. I will hopefully make time to address some of your points in an opportune time.

This I understand, I two am a householder (or least I will be for another week or two, just got my eviction notice :-( I have to say that I am an occasional browser and participant of alt.yoga due to my time, and not able to follow everyone’s contribution. I was not for example aware of a background that Stu has mentioned in his post. Please do not be disheartened by my self-confessed "Rajistic" :) reaction, as I *perceived* a "Tamasic" tendency. :) I like the kind of mental tools that yoga present us with, don’t you? :)

Not quite sure I get this, you seem to have a knack for abbreviating comment. :-) So, I hope there’s no hard feelings.

Of course not… As long as there is conversation (communication) ,   there is always an opportunity to get to know someone better. I think Stu’s finest contribution was facilitating this process of "getting to know you". I have to go and give my son a lift, and sorry I am writing this in a rush.

Have a couple myself, they can be less then understanding and patient sometimes :-) Namaste – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Shahin, Interesting… I’ve read your post a dozen times and I still don’t quite get it. So I will respond, point for point. I hope you’ll respond. After all you felt strongly enough to say what you did to the whole world. Wouldn’t it be a point of honor to allow me an exchange and perhaps some clarification? Regardless, you are not the only one reading this so, it’s important that I respond. By the way, I remember the last exchange we had re: yoga and acting. It was quite pleasant and one of my personal favorites. What you have written above is moonshine.

Homemade whiskey? An intoxicant. Opiate of the masses ala Marx. Is this what you meant? A regurgitation of half-learnt knowledge spoken by every cult and religion known to mankind.

You know what? I have studied perhaps 50-60% of all the religions (the main ones for sure) and I have never heard this idea stated as such anywhere but in Science of Mind and Yoga (which is a science, not a religion). Fact is not long ago (and today in certain parts of the world) I could be put to death for making such an assertion (they certainly took Jesus to task for it). So between your moonshine comment and your every religion comment  I am going to hazard a guess that you are atheist. Please don’t assume that I believe being atheist is negative, I don’t. I think everyone thinking person will be one at some time in their live(s). About the half learnt knowledge comment. Up until the time I knew there was God, I would have considered myself an atheist or at least and agnostic. I didn’t start to study religion or even say the G word, until I possessed that knowledge. So half learnt is inaccurate. In fact learnt doesn’t work for me either, I would say realized would be more to the point. One who is really in possession of the "truth" of "God" (!) will not offer such trite advice.

I can’t even fathom how you could term the knowing of the existence of God or any advice or claim in that regard as "trite". Britney Spears is trite, God is not. But if you are atheist, then I guess I could see it. I will give you unoriginal (trite) though. After all there is nothing new under the sun. (whoops, another trite saying) The awesome truth will be _realised_ at a level _above_ "God"

These words don’t refer to anything and so they don’t mean anything to me. What awesome truth? Do you know something you would you share it with me (us)? There is _no_ "God", (or gods), as frightening or disconcerting as it may appear.

What can I say? Simply not true. And yes you are very right, any discussion along this line would be hopelessly pointless for both you and I. I don’t believe either of us needs or wants a discussion of is there God. Is that correct? As I have said before, any comments I make are for whoever wants them and for whatever reason they want them. The last thing I am trying to do is convince anyone of anything. (I bet you don’t believe that. And I wouldn’t either if I was you. But I’m not you I am me; so believe it). At that level, "God" would cease to exist to reveal a higher quality. It is experiential, ineffable, unspeakable. It should be _found_ not given away, much less in your kind of preaching.

How right you are! But you know what? I may have struggled much longer then I did, had someone(s) not planted the seeds of possibility in my mind, which would eventually awaken and allow me hear the Truth. Remember there was no God in my world (and yes it was very frightening and disconcerting, not to mention painful) but there was God in some other’s world and they talked (not preached) about it. Thank God they did. All in all they were a pretty tuff bunch. I respected the ones who had been to prison the most. I find your incessant repetition of the word "God" distasteful if not downright offensive.

Why? (real question) Jared Namaste

Response:

"omjaroo" wrote – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Shahin, Interesting… I’ve read your post a dozen times and I still don’t quite get it. So I will respond, point for point. I hope you’ll respond. After all you felt strongly enough to say what you did to the whole world. Wouldn’t it be a point of honor to allow me an exchange and perhaps some clarification? Regardless, you are not the only one reading this so, it’s important that I respond. By the way, I remember the last exchange we had re: yoga and acting. It was quite pleasant and one of my personal favorites. What you have written above is moonshine. Homemade whiskey? An intoxicant. Opiate of the masses ala Marx. Is this what you meant? A regurgitation of half-learnt knowledge spoken by every cult and religion known to mankind. You know what? I have studied perhaps 50-60% of all the religions (the main ones for sure) and I have never heard this idea stated as such anywhere but in Science of Mind and Yoga (which is a science, not a religion). Fact is not long ago (and today in certain parts of the world) I could be put to death for making such an assertion (they certainly took Jesus to task for it). So between your moonshine comment and your every religion comment  I am going to hazard a guess that you are atheist. Please don’t assume that I believe being atheist is negative, I don’t. I think everyone thinking person will be one at some time in their live(s). About the half learnt knowledge comment. Up until the time I knew there was God, I would have considered myself an atheist or at least and agnostic. I didn’t start to study religion or even say the G word, until I possessed that knowledge. So half learnt is inaccurate. In fact learnt doesn’t work for me either, I would say realized would be more to the point. One who is really in possession of the "truth" of "God" (!) will not offer such trite advice. I can’t even fathom how you could term the knowing of the existence of God or any advice or claim in that regard as "trite". Britney Spears is trite, God is not. But if you are atheist, then I guess I could see it. I will give you unoriginal (trite) though. After all there is nothing new under the sun. (whoops, another trite saying) The awesome truth will be _realised_ at a level _above_ "God" These words don’t refer to anything and so they don’t mean anything to me. What awesome truth? Do you know something you would you share it with me (us)? There is _no_ "God", (or gods), as frightening or disconcerting as it may appear. What can I say? Simply not true. And yes you are very right, any discussion along this line would be hopelessly pointless for both you and I. I don’t believe either of us needs or wants a discussion of is there God. Is that correct? As I have said before, any comments I make are for whoever wants them and for whatever reason they want them. The last thing I am trying to do is convince anyone of anything. (I bet you don’t believe that. And I wouldn’t either if I was you. But I’m not you I am me; so believe it). At that level, "God" would cease to exist to reveal a higher quality. It is experiential, ineffable, unspeakable. It should be _found_ not given away, much less in your kind of preaching. How right you are! But you know what? I may have struggled much longer then I did, had someone(s) not planted the seeds of possibility in my mind, which would eventually awaken and allow me hear the Truth. Remember there was no God in my world (and yes it was very frightening and disconcerting, not to mention painful) but there was God in some other’s world and they talked (not preached) about it. Thank God they did. All in all they were a pretty tuff bunch. I respected the ones who had been to prison the most. I find your incessant repetition of the word "God" distasteful if not downright offensive. Why? (real question) Jared Namaste

Dear Omjaroo I realise that my reaction to you was harsh, and hope that I didn’t hurt your feelings. As you have mentioned above, we have had a pleasant exchange of views in the past, and I hold you to be a very nice fellow. I think you will find the answer to most of your questions above in my recent posts. Stu has also made a perceptive contribution to this discussion. At the moment I could only make time to reply to Wade, since I have to go and pay attention to my family members and my other duties. I will hopefully make time to address some of your points in an opportune time. I have to say that I am an occasional browser and participant of alt.yoga due to my time, and not able to follow everyone’s contribution. I was not for example aware of a background that Stu has mentioned in his post. Please do not be disheartened by my self-confessed "Rajistic" :) reaction, as I *perceived* a "Tamasic" tendency. :) I like the kind of mental tools that yoga present us with, don’t you? :) So, I hope there’s no hard feelings. I have to go and give my son a lift, and sorry I am writing this in a rush. Take care, Shahin

Response:

I read that Budha, after 6 years of efforts, and after he dropped the efforts and the moment came and he reached…..is that sure for anyone else? I wonder too if one has to be 100% mentally healthy before at least starting to deserve what he would get? Any thoughts? — Elias

If you have the ability to think you have the ability to meditate. Meditation will help you towards 100% mentally healthy.  Meditation should be all about effortlessness. — ~Stu

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "omjaroo" wrote Elias, A few thoughts in the normal "you" form. The "I" statements are in brackets. I long for understanding, yet the more I keep thinking of it, the more it seems that I am reaching no where. That’s because you are already there. [That's because I am already there.] Same time if I drop this idea and go living, and trying to be more aware in my life, then I remember that I am not doing anything towards my ultimate goal. There is no goal. Goals are a construct of desires. [There are no goals. Goals are a construct of my desire and fear] I am starting to feel that one needs no education to reach awareness, it would happen naturally and w/o efforts as one would breath w/o efforts. In this you are correct. Do whatever you want, it doesn’t matter. [No matter what I do it changes nothing] You are already there. You have never been anywhere else. If you must do something then accept what is true now. [All I need to do is to accept what is true, right now, there is only God] You are whatever God is just as a drop of sea water  is whatever the ocean is. You always have been and you always will be, because there is and only every has been, Now. Namaste Dear Omjaroo, What you have written above is moonshine. A regurgitation of half-learnt knowledge spoken by every cult and religion known to mankind. One who is really in possession of the "truth" of "God" (!) will not offer such trite advice. There is _no_ "God", (or gods), as frightening or disconcerting as it may appear. The awesome truth will be _realised_ at a level _above_ "God". At that level, "God" would cease to exist to reveal a higher quality. It is experiential, ineffable, unspeakable. It should be _found_ not given away, much less in your kind of preaching. I find your incessant repetition of the word "God" distasteful if not downright offensive. Please forgive me for not responding to your reply should you make one, if I consider it pointless. Regards, Shahin

Shahin, Its funny –  I agree with you and I also agree with Omjaroo.  I too am ever so slightly offended by his repetition of biblical references and the word "god".  They have a tendency to limit the unlimited infinite nature of the Void. However, it is important to understand Omjaroo’s story, as a yoga student struggling with alcoholism.  Omjaroo clearly has used the xtain mythology to help climb out of this addiction.  It clearly has been a positive force in his life.  And he wants to share this with those who come to this group. (I hope I am not out of line here).  It is not like he has attempted to prosthesis (which really offends me), but has clearly charitable intentions in his responses to those seeking council on the NG. An integral approach to this conundrum would be to understand that this limited view of "god" is important to Omjaroo’s current spiritual growth, where your spiritual growth has clearly transcended that limited definition. Compassion dictates that we understand the "truth" inside both these points of view. — ~Stu

Response:

"omjaroo" wrote – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Elias, A few thoughts in the normal "you" form. The "I" statements are in brackets. I long for understanding, yet the more I keep thinking of it, the more it seems that I am reaching no where. That’s because you are already there. [That's because I am already there.] Same time if I drop this idea and go living, and trying to be more aware in my life, then I remember that I am not doing anything towards my ultimate goal. There is no goal. Goals are a construct of desires. [There are no goals. Goals are a construct of my desire and fear] I am starting to feel that one needs no education to reach awareness, it would happen naturally and w/o efforts as one would breath w/o efforts. In this you are correct. Do whatever you want, it doesn’t matter. [No matter what I do it changes nothing] You are already there. You have never been anywhere else. If you must do something then accept what is true now. [All I need to do is to accept what is true, right now, there is only God] You are whatever God is just as a drop of sea water  is whatever the ocean is. You always have been and you always will be, because there is and only every has been, Now. Namaste

Dear Omjaroo, What you have written above is moonshine. A regurgitation of half-learnt knowledge spoken by every cult and religion known to mankind. One who is really in possession of the "truth" of "God" (!) will not offer such trite advice. There is _no_ "God", (or gods), as frightening or disconcerting as it may appear. The awesome truth will be _realised_ at a level _above_ "God". At that level, "God" would cease to exist to reveal a higher quality. It is experiential, ineffable, unspeakable. It should be _found_ not given away, much less in your kind of preaching. I find your incessant repetition of the word "God" distasteful if not downright offensive. Please forgive me for not responding to your reply should you make one, if I consider it pointless. Regards, Shahin

Response:

Hello, If you were told the future, how would you react? Would you ruin / interfere w/ the events that were going to happen if you hadn’t knew about it? If "’you’ knowing the future" is a predicted part and even if you knew then a predicted course of action is already there for you? I have read that unless you drop all expectations, all desires and thoughts, you won’t reach. I long for understanding, yet the more I keep thinking of it, the more it seems that I am reaching no where. Same time if I drop this idea and go living, and trying to be more aware in my life, then I remember that I am not doing anything towards my ultimate goal. Again there is confusion…some say drop efforts, some say stop wasting time and work for it… I am starting to feel that one needs no education to reach awarness, it would happen naturally and w/o efforts as one would breath w/o efforts. But it seems my mind made this statement to delude me or keep me waiting. But what to do if you keep expecting to reach awarness but then after frustration you would drop this goal and go on living w/o reaching your goal. I read that Budha, after 6 years of efforts, and after he dropped the efforts and the moment came and he reached…..is that sure for anyone else? I wonder too if one has to be 100% mentally healthy before at least starting to deserve what he would get? Any thoughts? — Elias

Response:

Elias, A few thoughts in the normal "you" form. The "I" statements are in brackets. I long for understanding, yet the more I keep thinking of it, the more it seems that I am reaching no where.

That’s because you are already there. [That's because I am already there.] Same time if I drop this idea and go living, and trying to be more aware in my life, then I remember that I am not doing anything towards my ultimate goal.

There is no goal. Goals are a construct of desires. [There are no goals. Goals are a construct of my desire and fear] I am starting to feel that one needs no education to reach awareness, it would happen naturally and w/o efforts as one would breath w/o efforts.

In this you are correct. Do whatever you want, it doesn’t matter. [No matter what I do it changes nothing] You are already there. You have never been anywhere else. If you must do something then accept what is true now. [All I need to do is to accept what is true, right now, there is only God] You are whatever God is just as a drop of sea water  is whatever the ocean is. You always have been and you always will be, because there is and only every has been, Now. Namaste

Response:

modified sun salutation

Question:

Hope this will help http://www.yoga-age.com/asanas/suria.html – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –     I am a beginner student that want to learn the correct form for surya namaskar, but some of it poses are very difficult or impossible for me to do by now. Right now I need to modify some of the poses due to my low flexibility. Is somewhere information, link or pictures that teach how to do it? There are many different ways to do that depending on where you are stiff. The most obvious remedial approach uses a chair placed against a wall for the hands, or facing up on an incline. However the poses are not too hard, and most can manage some version of the sequence on the ground. Start with what you can do, use your intelligence, and persist.

Response:

    I am a beginner student that want to learn the correct form for surya namaskar, but some of it poses are very difficult or impossible for me to do by now. Right now I need to modify some of the poses due to my low flexibility. Is somewhere information, link or pictures that teach how to do it?

There are many different ways to do that depending on where you are stiff. The most obvious remedial approach uses a chair placed against a wall for the hands, or facing up on an incline. However the poses are not too hard, and most can manage some version of the sequence on the ground. Start with what you can do, use your intelligence, and persist.

Response:

Hello!   I am a beginner student that want to learn the correct form for surya namaskar, but some of it poses are very difficult or impossible for me to do by now. Right now I need to modify some of the poses due to my low flexibility. Is somewhere information, link or pictures that teach how to do it?   Thanks in advance.

In the Iyengar school it is suggested you master the individual asanas before you complicate matters with jumpings.  Give yourself a good two years of disciplined practice to learn the alignment and balance of the poses within surya namaskar.  Learn to hold the asanas and to pose and repose in each one as a discreet unit.  If you have limitations of flexibility, it helps to use props to rapidly increase muscle limberness.  Ropes, bolsters, blankets, a wall all can help you achieve proper alignment in any asana no matter how difficult. Then when you ad jumpings to the mix you will be much less likely to injure yourself. — ~Stu

Response:

Hello!     I am a beginner student that want to learn the correct form for surya namaskar, but some of it poses are very difficult or impossible for me to do by now. Right now I need to modify some of the poses due to my low flexibility. Is somewhere information, link or pictures that teach how to do it?     Thanks in advance.

Response:

Hello!     I am a beginner student that want to learn the correct form for surya namaskar, but some of it poses are very difficult or impossible for me to do by now. Right now I need to modify some of the poses due to my low flexibility. Is somewhere information, link or pictures that teach how to do it?     Thanks in advance.

Hi, I suggest that you do not modify the asana. Instead follow the proper movements and breath sequences precisly but minimize the extreme position to whatever level you can confortably obtain. Even if the extreme position is nearly standing straight. What’s important is not how far you move into the positions but that you do them precisely, carefully, in the correct sequence and with your whole attention devoted to the movement. You can an explaination of the proper way to perform it at: http://www.santosha.com/asanas/suryanamaskar.html Good luck Namaste

Response:

How can I get her spine to straighten?

Question:

Surya Namaskar in the morning http://yogachola.de/yoga_styles/ashtanga/12_Surya_Namaskara_A.html And before retiring to bed at night Chandra Namaskar http://proliberty.com/pranayoga/ChandraNamaskar.html – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi folks, A lady friend of mine has asked me to teach her the meditation method I use. Unfortunately, she is obviously suffering from a bit of a slouch. At the moment, it seems that she cannot straighten her spine to assume a nice straight-backed psture. It looks to me that if she doesn’t get her spine to straighten up while she’s still in her 30s, it’ll get worse and worse as she gets older. I’m no therapist, but I suggested to her that she lies flat on her back for a while each day attempting to relax all the muscles in her back. I also suggested she spends a period each day sitting upright, attempting to straighten her spine, so that she starts developing the muscles needed for good posture. Anyone offer any other/better suggestion? Some yoga asanas, perhaps? Thank you MJ

Response:

Surya Namaskar in the morning http://yogachola.de/yoga_styles/ashtanga/12_Surya_Namaskara_A.html And before retiring to bed at night Chandra Namaskar http://proliberty.com/pranayoga/ChandraNamaskar.html

Thank you for this suggestion – and for the  URLs. I think I will suggest these to her – and do them myself too. I have got her starting on some morning and evening concentration exercises (preparation for future meditation). Would it be appropriate for her to do these immediately after completing the Vinyasas you rocommended? MJ

Response:

Yes Brother, that would be ideal. Enjoy your practice. Yours, Brahman-Atmananda – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have got her starting on some morning and evening concentration exercises (preparation for future meditation). Would it be appropriate for her to do these immediately after completing the Vinyasas you rocommended? MJ

Response:

Anyone offer any other/better suggestion? Some yoga asanas, perhaps? I remember how Sun Salutations (surya namaskar) really straightened me out.

Situps/crunches help most people because most have weak abdominal muscles. Crunches and the reverse, on your stomach, are generall good for developing good posture along with the sun salutations. Consulting a doctor might not be a bad idea, of course, in case there’s something structurally wrong. O, and using a chair for meditation isn’t always a bad thing. — Saddam has hundreds of Statues of Massive Construction. We have found them. -G.W. Bush (often misquoted by the liberal news)

Response:

Anyone offer any other/better suggestion? Some yoga asanas, perhaps?

I remember how Sun Salutations (surya namaskar) really straightened me out. Wade

Response:

Hi folks, A lady friend of mine has asked me to teach her the meditation method I use. Unfortunately, she is obviously suffering from a bit of a slouch. At the moment, it seems that she cannot straighten her spine to assume a nice straight-backed psture. It looks to me that if she doesn’t get her spine to straighten up while she’s still in her 30s, it’ll get worse and worse as she gets older. I’m no therapist, but I suggested to her that she lies flat on her back for a while each day attempting to relax all the muscles in her back. I also suggested she spends a period each day sitting upright, attempting to straighten her spine, so that she starts developing the muscles needed for good posture. Anyone offer any other/better suggestion? Some yoga asanas, perhaps? Thank you MJ

Response:

New to this field! HELP pls

Question:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just a couple? OK. First instead of sitting on chairs and couches, sit on the floor.  Sit on the floor a couple of hours a day.  Don’t worry about how you sit, just sit in your most natural position.  The body will adapt and sort itself out. Second, go OUTSIDE into nature and walk, run, bike, sit, whatever you can do for an hour and half a day. These two things will help immensely and are very very simple. — Wade

Best advice ever! I needed reminding, thank you. Especially the ’sit on the floor’ part. I need grounding right now! — The Ruminating Yoga Cow. Oh la Vache !

Response:

TY Wade, I do this already, bike & walk… and do meditation by sitting on the floor. It is good advice for ‘everyone’ though to ground themselves and to get out of their shacks!!! ;) cosmiK.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just a couple? OK. First instead of sitting on chairs and couches, sit on the floor.  Sit on the floor a couple of hours a day.  Don’t worry about how you sit, just sit in your most natural position.  The body will adapt and sort itself out. Second, go OUTSIDE into nature and walk, run, bike, sit, whatever you can do for an hour and half a day. These two things will help immensely and are very very simple. — Wade I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Response:

Hi, I suggest two actions. 1. Please visit the sie www.yogapoint.com where you will find some gerat content on Applied Yoga and, I am sure you will not be dissapointed. Regards Neeraj – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Response:

You can do Surya Namaskar (Sun Salutations).  It is a complete practice all in itself. See http://www.webindia123.com/yoga/suryana.htm Its not that I endorse the site, but with a quick web search, I found I liked the pictures. You can forget what they say about all yoga sessions starting with it, and about limiting yourself to 4.  Do not worry about the slowly part either.  There are many styles of sun salutations. Slow, fast, jumping….  I had a class where each of the students came up with 12 variations of their own (there was about 10 of us). Do them fairly quickly when learning them, start at 10 or 20 reps. For the bold and those wanting to be fit work your way up to 108. For the really bold try 1080! At a good clip 108 will take about 15-20 mins. The keys to doing them, are not trying too hard and syncing your breath with the motions.  Most of the diffcutly people find in doing them is self-created resistence, literally the muscle pairs fighting each other, making the effort required way more than is necessary. This self-created resistence is one of the impediments to flexibility, as to be flexible muscle groups must not resist one another, but cooperate to "bend" in a coordinated direction. — Wade

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – TY Wade, I do this already, bike & walk… and do meditation by sitting on the floor. It is good advice for ‘everyone’ though to ground themselves and to get out of their shacks!!! ;) cosmiK.

Response:

Just a couple? OK. First instead of sitting on chairs and couches, sit on the floor.  Sit on the floor a couple of hours a day.  Don’t worry about how you sit, just sit in your most natural position.  The body will adapt and sort itself out. Second, go OUTSIDE into nature and walk, run, bike, sit, whatever you can do for an hour and half a day. These two things will help immensely and are very very simple. — Wade

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Response:

KEEP IT SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE! Be BLISSFUL by doing Krishna’s Kriya all the time! http://www.ky.v-2-1.net/ NEW!!! Krishna’s Picture New ATMA BODHA text adopted for Krishna’s Kriya! There is only Love in every Heart to share. Narayana :)

Response:

Autobiography of a Yogi (1946 Edition), by Paramhansa Yogananda (http://www.crystalclarity.com/books/ay_book.asp) Complete Illustrated Book of Yoga, by Swami Vishnu-devananda (http://www.sivananda.org/la/boutique/yogastore/books/ciby.htm) Science of Being and Art of Living, by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (http://mumpress.com/p_a05.html) Yoga Journal’s Practice Series, featuring Patricia Walden and Rodney Yee (http://www.yogajournal.com/shop/moreinfo.cfm?Product_ID=113) So get yourself a nice mat and start! That is all you need for now. Brother Brahman-Atmananda http://www.onegreatpower.org – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Response:

I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Response:

I have checked a couple sites on the net about yoga, but hav’nt found anythig basic to begin with. Can anyone explain a couple of simple methods and how it will helpme overall. My aim to become physically flexible and fit? And also to have a calm mind and body… I meditate (started). Ty.

Hi, Why not find a class in your area to learn? Look in the yellow pages. Some classes are on a pay by class basis 10-15$ a class. If you could do that you could find out if you like it first. From a previous post —  I recommend Swami Vishnudevananda’s book for hatha yoga and pranayama. Below is a link to Vishnu’s Complete Illustrated Book of Yoga. http://www.sivananda.org/la/boutique/yogastore/books/ciby.htm It shows a good picture of the book, but you can get it cheaper here – (and it shows the contents and 39 sample pages – for 12.60$) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0517884313/ref%3Dlib%5F… CV/rea/104-5514893-5215934 Below is Vishnu’s book Meditation and Mantas – (has a good picture of Vishnu/the cover – 9$) http://www.sivananda.org/la/boutique/yogastore/books/mnm.htm Yoga supplies – a teacher I know at Sunflower Yoga (Sivananda) – http://idbdnet.com/yoga/yogagoods.html Sivananda was Vishnu’s guru. Here are where the free downloadable books are for Sivananda – http://www.sivanandadlshq.org/download/download.htm Kartik Vashishta in this NG puts out a Sivananda Daily reading. There are lots of different types of yoga. Kundalini Yoga is completely different than hatha yoga. I specifically recommend against Power Yoga because they do not hold in the extreme position and holding and resting are important. (they will complain but that is their problem) Mike Dubbeld – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Is yoga good for losing weight?

Question:

Hello Marcus <snip Ashtanga and Iyengar are different systems, both of them have vocal proponents. Alignment is not that important in Ashtanga (it is not ballet), more focus is placed on breathing, vinyasa and the bandhas. To my understanding no heat is generated during Iyengar practise while sweating is an integral part of Ashtanga. Ashtanga is vigorous.

On the contrary, there often IS heat generated during Iyengar practise. That isn’t a goal or a focal point of the practice (such as it is in Bikram style yoga), but it just naturally happens, especially during standing poses and other vigorous poses such as sun salutations. Amy

Response:

MARCUS      did you completely miss the part about chanting one of the names of SURYA after each Sunsalute, do you know and understand nothing of PUJA and how Surya is worshiped for health and strength and is know as Namaskara Priya (fond of) and the blessing he can bestow.  What about awareness and alignment that is sacrificed in Astanga practice. I never said for the 108 to be the only Yoga. Iyengar understanding of the poses is far superior to pathabi jois’es, even Krishnamacharya said so. there is a lack of awareness in normal astanga practice, I’ll chose the devotion practice of surya namaskars with the mantra over it any day. Colin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Thanks, I am familiar with the astanga system and disagree with it being better. We all have a right to our own opinion. Come on, how can anybody think that 108 sun salutations (which takes a long time to do) could somehow be "better" or "more balanced" than the Ashtanga primary series. I like Ashtanga and the strength it gives me. Marcus

Response:

While I believe that B.K.S. Iyengar is the greatest teacher of Yoga today, I find it hard to believe that he would recommend 108 Surya Namaskars to anyone. He always teaches a balanced program no matter what the problem or disorder.

Response:

In one sentence you say:  Alignment is not that important in Ashtanga  Then you procede to say it is superior for allingment: You may do as you please, but in the context of losing weight and aligning and stregthening the body the Ashtanga system should be superior.

It is obvious we agree to disagree,but you would be advised to temper your statement with a phrase like ‘ in my humble opinion’s unless your practice has made your ego stronger as well. CE

Response:

Oirt:   I never proposed this was the complete program given but a major component of it. It takes me 25min and on the average will take someone 45 min. This was a recommendation made by him in the 1950’s to a couple from Bombay.  Aside from the Iyengar reference there is a very long standing tradition of the practice combined with Sarvangasana & Sirsasana (twist are the major part of a balanced practice missing). Much like the tradition of chanting 1000 Gayatri Mantras a day. this is not the core of  my practice but at times I have let it slip I build up to this by adding 9 a day until 108 is reached and it has been powerful for rebuilding the strength and flexibility. if one does build slowly and practices the insertion of the Surya mantras as per my original post the result is amazing.

Response:

The way the astanga group practices them I agree but not if done correctly. If you notice the version I recommend does not include chataranga dandasana which can be hard on the shoulders if not done properly. As far as the wrist issue most people put too much weight on the base of the palms, if the weight is transferred to the mounds of the fingers the wrist will not be damaged.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I would recommend 108 sun salutations a day. I love sun salutations, but this sounds like a recipe for chronic wrist and shoulder pain.

Response:

Thanks, I am familiar with the astanga system and disagree with it being better. We all have a right to our own opinion. regards, Colin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When my Hatha yoga teachers approached BKS Iyengar one being over weight and one under he gave them both this same program and they both came into balance. It provides strengthening work, aerobic work as well as stretching. If one wants aerobic and strenghtening work in addition to stretching, the primary series in Ashtanga yoga would be much much better than just doing 108 sun salutations. Ashtanga practise is started with 5x Surya Namaskar A + 5x B. The sun salutation you posted here is quite similar to Surya Namaskar B in Ashtanga, but in Ashtanga there is Virabhadrasana B instead of just doing ‘the lunge’. Marcus

Response:

A regular sequence of standing asanas will do the job. 30 seconds each side; longer if you can manage–except for the Virabadrasanas which should be 20 secs.

Response:

…The "only" exersise I do now is Yoga and a lot of walking and I am in much better shape now than when I went to the gym and worked out on boring, boring machines. Definately true! I tried yoga while in Japan along with lots of walking. Drinking water as well. It works. No more gyms. Saving so much money as well.

Response:

Do a search on OXYCISE and read Miss Johnsons story.  It looks like a variation of yoga specifically for weight control. Her claim is breath control is the key, thus Oxycise. 30 seconds each side; longer if you can manage–except for the Virabadrasanas which should be 20 secs.

She give 30 exercises 30 seconds each or  15 minutes a day.

Response:

The process of burning fat has to do with the fatcells having sites to cross over into the muscles to be burned. The stretching aspects of yoga create a longer surface area to the muscles giving the fat cells more places to cross over into the muscle. The aerobic exercise from holding postures gives the energy needed to burn the fat. because the postures are held in the stretched positions the fat has a chance to cross over. I would recommend 108 sun salutations a day. Start with 9 and add 9 each week. Instr:  http://www.srichakrayoga.com/surya.htm If you would like info on herbs to help as well e-mail me privatly Hope this helps, Colin

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Is yoga good for losing weight? if yes, why?

Response:

I would recommend 108 sun salutations a day.

I love sun salutations, but this sounds like a recipe for chronic wrist and shoulder pain.

Response:

When my Hatha yoga teachers approached BKS Iyengar one being over weight and one under he gave them both this same program and they both came into balance. It provides strengthening work, aerobic work as well as stretching. 108 is the traditional number for many reasons. 9 is the number for divinity and 3 is the number for god. 108 is the first 3 digit multiple of 9. It is also traditional to chant the Surya astrotram of 108 http://www.hindunet.org/stotras/itx/suurya108.txt     names of Surya (the sun god) with each salute. There is also a version with 13 names that can be practices if one is not yet fit for the 108 http://www.hindukids.org/sooryanamaskar.shtml. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I would recommend 108 sun salutations a day. Why? Marcus

Response:

Is yoga good for losing weight? if yes, why?

All movement is good for losing weight.  More rapid movement is "better" than less rapid movement, but some movement is better than no movement.  Beyond its variable (minimal or modest or significant, take your pick) contribution to burning calories, yoga consistently contributes to the building of strength and flexibility.  Strength translates into a higher resting basal metabolic rate.  Both strength and flexibility translate into a lower incidence of injury from other, more consistently aerobic physical activities. I vary my practice of yoga based on my needs and current status. Sometimes, it is mostly stretching, burning no more than three calories per minute, a very minimal amount, thereby not contributing much to weight loss.  Sometimes, it is a vigorous vintage, resulting in pools of sweat and probably closer to seven calories per minute burned.  YMMV. —

morning exercises

Question:

anyone know any good morning exercises.,….energizing exercises?

        I’ve found through my own experience that flexing and turning the spine systematically in all the directions stimulates the body a lot. It is not a very "spiritual" practice, but gives some help.         1. Stand erect. Bend your body back and forth several times.         2. Then bend left and right.         3. Then rotate the shoulders left and right         4. Then do 1..3 only with the head (so exercise only the neck).         The first movements must be soft and with less amplitude. You can increase the amplitude in the final movements of each exercise.         Like i said, it is not rocket science, but it works. The nerves in the spine get a lot of stimulation this way, and you can even feel the chackras vibrating a little bit more intense. It is very good to practise it in the morning, right after awakening.         At least, it works for me. :-)         There are also the energising exercises from SRF, which are more ellaborate, complex and effective, but you have to be a SRF student to receive them.         Best thoughts, — Florin Andrei http://members.linuxstart.com/~florin/ "I trust Linus over BIOS vendors, every single time" – Alan Cox

Response:

I agree!  I have taught fitness classes for years and have used the sun salutations as a warm-up before my workouts.  Many of the videos I exercise to in the morning do not have an appropriate length warmup and the sun salutations are excellent way for me get a good warmup in the morning.  I have not found a finer warmup or a better cross-training regimen! lnelson1280 As anyone practising Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga can tell you, five Sun Salutions A and five Sun Salutions B really get you going :-) . Tapani T. a and b? what’s the difference?

Response:

As anyone practising Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga can tell you, five Sun Salutions A and five Sun Salutions B really get you going :-) . Tapani T.

a and b? what’s the difference?

Response:

whats the difference between A and B? i thought there was just one standard 12-move salute..? peace and thanks – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – As anyone practising Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga can tell you, five Sun Salutions A and five Sun Salutions B really get you going :-) . Tapani T.

Response:

As anyone practising Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga can tell you, five Sun Salutions A and five Sun Salutions B really get you going :-) . Tapani T.

Response:

anyone know any good morning exercises.,….energizing exercises? thanks peace ian

Response:

ian If you wake up before dawn I find that after answering the calls of nature, simply sitting peacefully with spine long (draped with blankets to avoid the cold) and then taking inventory of the body in order to release any tension, implementing deep diaphragmatic breath, visualizing the spine and chakras and then a silent meditation gets my energy flowing and aligned in the morning. Remember in meditation its the quality not the quantity (duration) that counts. Then I usually start with tadasana (standing mountain pose), then surya namaskar (salutation to the sun) (there are many variations. Standing poses in general energize and strengthen, but most every asana can be said to be energizing (even corpse pose) if practiced for that purpose. Enjoy! peace

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – anyone know any good morning exercises.,….energizing exercises? thanks peace ian

Response:

Lunar calendar & yoga

Question:

Wonderful, This has been worth waiting for! Never better described western mentality! There really exist two tipes of "yoga" : The western concept of yoga (kundalini, hatha…) and The yoga. Westerns are amazing, there isn`t a thing which they couldn`t sell. Do you have any yoga type free of charge?????   Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads.     How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha!   PS: I’m crossposting a few articles from alt.yoga as a followup to a few discussions on Shiva/Shakti in Hinduism.     Dear members!     Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.     Thank you for any infomation.     Xenia.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Draga Zeljka, pretpostavljam da ti nisi "zapadnjak", i bavis se "The" yogom.Jesi li sigurna da na zapadu nema "prave" yoge? Pozdrav, Petar — standard disclaimer:  :-) There really exist two tipes of "yoga" : The western concept of yoga (kundalini, hatha…) and The yoga. Westerns are amazing, there isn`t a thing which they couldn`t sell. Do you have any yoga type free of charge????? Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads.

Nobody? What about you, please explain? Dear members! Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang. Thank you for any infomation. Xenia.

Siva and Sakti or Yin and Yang refer to the two energies. Sun and Moon also. Moon should not be taken literally here. Siva energy or Moon energy flows through the "moon gate" or Chandra bindu" which is situated right above the head.

Response:

That was good!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – X-Ftn-To: Petar Draga Zeljka, pretpostavljam da ti nisi "zapadnjak", i bavis se "The" yogom.Jesi li sigurna da na zapadu nema "prave" yoge? Pozdrav, Petar Khm, if I just respond to this, it’ll have a limited audience, so I’ll translate first (please, stick to English on alt.* hierarchy, we’re not in Croatia): — Dear Zeljka, I guess you’re not "from West", and that you practice "The" yoga. Are you sure that there is no "real" yoga in the West? Greetings, Petar. — :) ) Yes, well, I guess that a real yogi should come from India, wear funny clothes, talk bad English, read some rare books written on palm leaves, that almost nobody else can read, and charge nothing. That’s because everybody knows that God lives in India, and so everybody outside India, who claims to have realized God, must be a fake. Chakras, nadis, prana and Kundalini also exist only in India, and nobody else can figure them out unless he reads about them in ancient books. Also, a real guru would never accept money. Guru daksina is, of course, invented by the Westerners; rumors that it’s an ancient custom in India to reward the guru with money in order to honor his effort is of course a malevolent lie. One should never accept money for anything spiritual; money should be accepted only for the bad things, done against the laws of nature and one’s feeling of rightness. So, if you have enough hard time working against your will, you can accept the money, but not if you really enjoy what you’re doing. One should pay the doctors for keeping you sick, not for keeping you healthy. If so, why would one pay the guru for showing the way to liberation? One would of course only pay a fraud. The good things should never be rewarded, because only the bad guys should have the money and rule the world. If someone spiritual attempts to create enough might on the planet to make a real difference, we should immediately stop him and recognize him as a fake; real spiritual people should live in caves, letting the bad guys rule undisturbed. God of course wants the world to be governed by polluting industry and Microsoft, not by the yogis. Yogis should stay out of the way. They can preach things only if they have no real power to implement them. They should also restrain from sex, because if they have sex, they could also have children, and if they have children, they would give them the education inconsistent with our perfect society, and society doesn’t want enlightened children, who practice sadhana from early youth. Children should learn how to fit the society, how to become a well serving part of the machine. They should not think, examine, criticize, or, even worse, change anything. We should therefore keep the gurus poor and celibate, we should render them powerless, and say that the only ones worth something are from India; God forbid that anyone thinks that the principles of yoga are as universal as the laws of physics, here for anyone to discover. Yoga should be restrained to Indian folklore, with all the funny rituals. We can even make a TV show about them, or put them in the ZOO, when they become an endangered species. — Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://www.danijel.org Don’t look for the truth. It will disturb your illusions, and they’re all that you have.

Response:

Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads.   How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha! PS: I’m crossposting a few articles from alt.yoga as a followup to a few discussions on Shiva/Shakti in Hinduism.   Dear members!   Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.   Thank you for any infomation.   Xenia.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – X-Ftn-To: Petar Draga Zeljka, pretpostavljam da ti nisi "zapadnjak", i bavis se "The" yogom.Jesi li sigurna da na zapadu nema "prave" yoge? Pozdrav, Petar Khm, if I just respond to this, it’ll have a limited audience, so I’ll translate first (please, stick to English on alt.* hierarchy, we’re not in Croatia): — Dear Zeljka, I guess you’re not "from West", and that you practice "The" yoga. Are you sure that there is no "real" yoga in the West? Greetings, Petar. — :) ) Yes, well, I guess that a real yogi should come from India, wear funny clothes, talk bad English, read some rare books written on palm leaves, that almost nobody else can read, and charge nothing. That’s because everybody knows that God lives in India, and so everybody outside India, who claims to have realized God, must be a fake. Chakras, nadis, prana and Kundalini also exist only in India, and nobody else can figure them out unless he reads about them in ancient books. Also, a real guru would never accept money. Guru daksina is, of course, invented by the Westerners; rumors that it’s an ancient custom in India to reward the guru with money in order to honor his effort is of course a malevolent lie. One should never accept money for anything spiritual; money should be accepted only for the bad things, done against the laws of nature and one’s feeling of rightness. So, if you have enough hard time working against your will, you can accept the money, but not if you really enjoy what you’re doing. One should pay the doctors for keeping you sick, not for keeping you healthy. If so, why would one pay the guru for showing the way to liberation? One would of course only pay a fraud. The good things should never be rewarded, because only the bad guys should have the money and rule the world. If someone spiritual attempts to create enough might on the planet to make a real difference, we should immediately stop him and recognize him as a fake; real spiritual people should live in caves, letting the bad guys rule undisturbed. God of course wants the world to be governed by polluting industry and Microsoft, not by the yogis. Yogis should stay out of the way. They can preach things only if they have no real power to implement them. They should also restrain from sex, because if they have sex, they could also have children, and if they have children, they would give them the education inconsistent with our perfect society, and society doesn’t want enlightened children, who practice sadhana from early youth. Children should learn how to fit the society, how to become a well serving part of the machine. They should not think, examine, criticize, or, even worse, change anything. We should therefore keep the gurus poor and celibate, we should render them powerless, and say that the only ones worth something are from India; God forbid that anyone thinks that the principles of yoga are as universal as the laws of physics, here for anyone to discover. Yoga should be restrained to Indian folklore, with all the funny rituals. We can even make a TV show about them, or put them in the ZOO, when they become an endangered species.

LOL Very good ;-) ) Sat Nam – Hari Har Singh – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://www.danijel.org Don’t look for the truth. It will disturb your illusions, and they’re all that you have.

Response:

X-Ftn-To: Petar Draga Zeljka, pretpostavljam da ti nisi "zapadnjak", i bavis se "The" yogom.Jesi li sigurna da na zapadu nema "prave" yoge? Pozdrav, Petar

Khm, if I just respond to this, it’ll have a limited audience, so I’ll translate first (please, stick to English on alt.* hierarchy, we’re not in Croatia): — Dear Zeljka, I guess you’re not "from West", and that you practice "The" yoga. Are you sure that there is no "real" yoga in the West? Greetings, Petar.

:) ) Yes, well, I guess that a real yogi should come from India, wear funny clothes, talk bad English, read some rare books written on palm leaves, that almost nobody else can read, and charge nothing. That’s because everybody knows that God lives in India, and so everybody outside India, who claims to have realized God, must be a fake. Chakras, nadis, prana and Kundalini also exist only in India, and nobody else can figure them out unless he reads about them in ancient books. Also, a real guru would never accept money. Guru daksina is, of course, invented by the Westerners; rumors that it’s an ancient custom in India to reward the guru with money in order to honor his effort is of course a malevolent lie. One should never accept money for anything spiritual; money should be accepted only for the bad things, done against the laws of nature and one’s feeling of rightness. So, if you have enough hard time working against your will, you can accept the money, but not if you really enjoy what you’re doing. One should pay the doctors for keeping you sick, not for keeping you healthy. If so, why would one pay the guru for showing the way to liberation? One would of course only pay a fraud. The good things should never be rewarded, because only the bad guys should have the money and rule the world. If someone spiritual attempts to create enough might on the planet to make a real difference, we should immediately stop him and recognize him as a fake; real spiritual people should live in caves, letting the bad guys rule undisturbed. God of course wants the world to be governed by polluting industry and Microsoft, not by the yogis. Yogis should stay out of the way. They can preach things only if they have no real power to implement them. They should also restrain from sex, because if they have sex, they could also have children, and if they have children, they would give them the education inconsistent with our perfect society, and society doesn’t want enlightened children, who practice sadhana from early youth. Children should learn how to fit the society, how to become a well serving part of the machine. They should not think, examine, criticize, or, even worse, change anything. We should therefore keep the gurus poor and celibate, we should render them powerless, and say that the only ones worth something are from India; God forbid that anyone thinks that the principles of yoga are as universal as the laws of physics, here for anyone to discover. Yoga should be restrained to Indian folklore, with all the funny rituals. We can even make a TV show about them, or put them in the ZOO, when they become an endangered species. — Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://www.danijel.org Don’t look for the truth. It will disturb your illusions, and they’re all that you have.

Response:

Draga Zeljka, pretpostavljam da ti nisi "zapadnjak", i bavis se "The" yogom.Jesi li sigurna da na zapadu nema "prave" yoge? Pozdrav, Petar — standard disclaimer:  :-)

Wonderful, This has been worth waiting for! Never better described western mentality! There really exist two tipes of "yoga" : The western concept of yoga (kundalini, hatha…) and The yoga. Westerns are amazing, there isn`t a thing which they couldn`t sell. Do you have any yoga type free of charge?????

Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads. How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha! PS: I’m crossposting a few articles from alt.yoga as a followup to a few discussions on Shiva/Shakti in Hinduism. Dear members! Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang. Thank you for any infomation. Xenia.

Response:

Wow!  A witch!  In the Shiva/Shakti tradition that makes you a Shakti devotee.  I bet you didn’t even know that! I did know about Shakti, but not the specifics. I am researching into that these days after your posting ji :o ) There was no  links on her from yahoo, but looking for Parwati made me find a lot. Thanks for the information, I will keep looking into this! Maybe I can find some more informaion in India when I go there again next month. Lene -)

I am happy for you.  You seem quite resourceful, I am sure you’ll discover things.

Response:

Wow!  A witch!  In the Shiva/Shakti tradition that makes you a Shakti devotee.  I bet you didn’t even know that!

I did know about Shakti, but not the specifics. I am researching into that these days after your posting ji :o ) There was no  links on her from yahoo, but looking for Parwati made me find a lot. Thanks for the information, I will keep looking into this! Maybe I can find some more informaion in India when I go there again next month. Lene -) I am geek-girl, hear me roar! ICQ# 43329381 http://www.uio.no/~pus

Response:

i love surya namaskar – i always start with it.  can you point me at some specifics on moon salutations? i’m quite interested, thank you

There are several different "moon salutations". One is much like Surya namaskar. My favourite is however this one. first notes: Be aware that you perform the whole exercise in one contionuous flowing movement, but *very very slow*. Breathe relaxed and calm. Then forget about breathing (don’t stop breathing, just let it be). Follow the changes in position with your attention all the time. 1. Stand in Tadasana (mountain), concentrate on the asana and how to build it up, finally to relax in Tadasana. Take about one minute to settle in this Now, lower the body *very slowly* while keeping the spine absolutely vertical, and also keep the heels in contact with the  floor at all times. Just gently and ever so slowly bend ancle, knee and hip joints… At the point you cannot get any lower without lifting the heels from the floor, stop this movement Continue with the Head: let it roll backwards (looking up) as slowly and in one continuous movement as the ones before. Keep all muscles in the head (face – jaws etc) relaxed! At the point you cannot move your head further backward start to reverse the movement; using the same slow speed put the head in normal position again. continue with reversal of the first movement: stretch the legs again and go back to Tadasana. attention: during this part keep your attention still focussed on awareness of Earth beneath the feet! 2. As soon as tadasana has been reached continue in one flowing move with the next movement: Raise both arms sidewards up – hands making a half-circle – till hands meet above head. Stretch arms to bring hands even higher, head is pressed between upper arms here. The spine is stretched up disc by disc… (Imagine there is a rope hanging there and you are slowly being pulled up by it…) Keep the feet flat on the floor at all times however! Stretching goes top-down, arms first then back then even legs… At the max every movement is again reversed until Tadasana is reached again. 3. Now continue from tadasana (without one moment of rest!) by slowly rotating the head forward until chin reats upon the chest. Keep your arms completely relaxed, they just dangle from your shoulders! Continue by slowly bending forward and at the same time ‘curling up’ your spine. That is, imagine a snail is moving downwards along your spine, and every time a disc is passed you bend that one disc… This ‘curls’ up your spine very slowly. Simply bend forwards. Continue until your upper bodyweight kind of ‘hangs’ supported only by the hip-joint. try not to use lower back for this! Going back to tadasana in reverse order; disc by disc the spine is erected again… Try to be aware of what this does to you: in 1 – feel Earth under your feet in 2/3 – feel if you can sense more ’space’ or ‘enlargement’ Try to give room to the exercise – allow it to proceed by itself.

Response:

Yoga is typically free of charge in India. At least nobody charges $275 for two classes like these Kriya Yoga organizations.  Basically knowledge is transferred word of mouth, only in the cities in India is there a "charge" for learning yoga.  But the kind of people who learn yoga in the cities are largely interested in weight reduction and not really obtaining siddhis. Yogic knowledge can be derived in the west through reading books.  Though not quite free of charge, it is not altogether different from the practices of various groups in the US practicing yoga.  I’ve never run into any organization which seems to have "occult" knowledge of yoga beyond what is published in books from the Bihar School of Yoga for example. To some extent, the knowledge required depends also on what you want to do with yoga.  If you’re looking for improved health and developing deeper levels of consciousness, the basic yogic exercises given in most decent books will serve well.  But if you’re looking to do very specific things, achieve specific goals, then it becomes the realm of Shakti or what is termed in the west as "tantra."  In the east it is all the same thing, as it is part of the same family of Shaivite/Shakti deities.  Tantra is more concerned with obtaining specific objectives.  It is also the kind of practice that ancient Kshatriyas used to develop to aid their battlefield proficiency.  It is one thing to be able to enter and come out of different kinds of states of consciousness (samadhi of various types).  But it is altogether different to be able to wield "divine weapons" in the Hindu tradition.  The first would be classified in the west as "yoga" and the second as "tantra." The concepts are somewhat similar in China and is shared by what is called the "spiritual" forms of Kung Fu.

  Wonderful,   This has been worth waiting for! Never better described western mentality! There really exist two tipes of "yoga" : The western concept of yoga (kundalini, hatha…) and The yoga.   Westerns are amazing, there isn`t a thing which they couldn`t sell. Do you have any yoga type free of charge?????     Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads.       How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha!     PS: I’m crossposting a few articles from alt.yoga as a followup to a few discussions on Shiva/Shakti in Hinduism.       Dear members!       Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.       Thank you for any infomation.       Xenia.

Response:

There is an ancient practice called Swara yoga which is a form of pranayama (some say that pranayama is a form of swara yoga). It is a tantric practice which deals quite intricately with the phases of the moon in relationship to the flow of breath in the left and right (moon and sun) nostrils. It is used for all sorts of information about "self", self healing, daily diet, activities, prediction, tapping into the inner wisdom, etc,  but most yogis use it for meditation utilizing what is known as the sushumna breath. See the Yoga FAQs for a boit more — I think there is a small bibliography there). Namaste!

Response:

As a practicing witch I am very interested in this topic Sardarji, and I would appreciate if you could tell something more of this, maybe if there are some books or websites that can tell me more. My knowledge of hinduism and its connection to the moon is not too good as most my indian friends are sikhs and one only has so many hours in the day to learn new stuff.

i believe that 11 days after the full moon and new moon is a time called ‘eckadashi’ in sanscrit, and it is best to have a fast then, according to this little Ananda Marga book i’ve got ‘the vegetarian philosophy’.  think i’ve read the same thing in this great book on Sivananda Yoga  i’ve got somewhere.

Response:

Wow!  A witch!  In the Shiva/Shakti tradition that makes you a Shakti devotee.  I bet you didn’t even know that! But in any case.  The three most important influences on the individual’s body cycles in Hinduism are considered to be those of the Moon, Sun, and the Earth.  The Moon is considered cooling the Sun is deemed heating.  Some times of the year in the Hindu calendar are considered especially suited to yoga practice due to the combination of the Sun and Moon factors — a particular lunar month and then particular times of the lunar cycle, generally starting from the new moon.  In my experience those are the times when I’ve had the best yoga sessions, once without even knowing that the day was a particularly auspicious one. But the energy cycles of the body in Hinduism are related to the planetary factors which constitute the Kala chakra or the cycle of time.  Different times of the day are deemed suited in Hinduism for different deities.  It is not that worshipping any deity at different times is forbidden, but depending on the deity you can maximize the effects by following the time recommendation. As for the Bindu chakra — yes it is associated with the moon.  BUT DON’T FORGET THE ANCIENT STORY OF SHIVA — when the poison of time emerged during the "churning" of the principles of Ayurveda (Dhanvantari the deity of Ayurveda emerges at the end holding a pot of nectar)  and threatened to destroy the amrit (ambrosia) of life considered to drop from the Bindu, Shiva held the poison within his throat not allowing it to destroy him and so he is termed the blue throated one.  And yes the Visuddhi chakra is also associated with the lunar cycle.  And yes, the lunar cycle is the most important in yoga.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows = the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed = the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their = heads. =20 As a practicing witch I am very interested in this topic Sardarji, and I would appreciate if you could tell something more of this, maybe if there are some books or websites that can tell me more. My knowledge of hinduism and its connection to the moon is not too good as most my indian friends are sikhs and one only has so many hours in the day to learn new stuff. How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one = to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other = to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be = trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha! :o D Lene -) I am geek-girl, hear me roar! ICQ# 43329381 http://www.uio.no/~pus

Response:

i love surya namaskar – i always start with it.  can you point me at some specifics on moon salutations?   i’m quite interested, thank you charlie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -It is much like the Surya namaskar – Chandra namaskar. There are several slightly different ways of practicing it. It is also a sequence of movements, performed dynamically just like surya namaskar. The effect of this one is that you may become more aware / open to the female quality in the flow of energy that it generates. Surya namaskarasana does the same for the male quality… OM Shanti

Response:

Dear Kunal Singh, At least you are correct about (your referrence to) Chandra Bindu which is situated above the head… I do like your other observations too :-) Western ppl tend to use the head too much, think more than feel, or listen to the Heart. ps. What is the crossposting about (siva – sakti)? I did not follow the thread in the other ng…     Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their heads.       How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha!     PS: I’m crossposting a few articles from alt.yoga as a followup to a few discussions on Shiva/Shakti in Hinduism.         Dear members!         Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.         Thank you for any infomation.         Xenia.

Response:

moon salutation??? haven’t come across that, what is it?

It is much like the Surya namaskar – Chandra namaskar. There are several slightly different ways of practicing it. It is also a sequence of movements, performed dynamically just like surya namaskar. The effect of this one is that you may become more aware / open to the female quality in the flow of energy that it generates. Surya namaskarasana does the same for the male quality… OM Shanti

Response:

Heh, heh, heh!  After all these types of yogas, apparently nobody knows = the relevance of the moon phase to yoga — i.e. they’ve never noticed = the crown on top of Shiva/Shakti, that they wear the new moon on their = heads. =20

As a practicing witch I am very interested in this topic Sardarji, and I would appreciate if you could tell something more of this, maybe if there are some books or websites that can tell me more. My knowledge of hinduism and its connection to the moon is not too good as most my indian friends are sikhs and one only has so many hours in the day to learn new stuff. How many yogis does it take to figure out yoga in the west ?  Two, one = to describe the difference between Vedic Hinduism and Yoga and the other = to differentiate that Yoga with a particular brand name that can be = trademarked!  Ha, ha, ha!

:o D Lene -) I am geek-girl, hear me roar! ICQ# 43329381 http://www.uio.no/~pus

Response:

moon salutation??? haven’t come across that, what is it? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Yes. But little. I only know Sun salutation and moon salutation are done to "attract" the corresponding energy…    Dear members!    Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.    Thank you for any infomation.    Xenia.

Response:

Dear members! Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang. Thank you for any infomation. Xenia.

Response:

Yes. But little. I only know Sun salutation and moon salutation are done to "attract" the corresponding energy…     Dear members!     Do you know or have you ever heard about correlation between Moon phases and definite appropriate asanas?  It also has something to do with Yin/Yang.     Thank you for any infomation.     Xenia.

Response:

forward fold

Question:

Hi Sue: I have chondromalacia in my knees, too, you may remember.  The movement Stu describes is very helpful for knees.  The tightening of the quads, "pulling up the kneecap" strengthens the quads without stressing the knee caps.  Strengthening and avoiding stressing are both important. (Kneeling, for example, stresses the knee caps and so I don’t do it. Also stair climbing is also stressful so I avoid it as much as possible.)  When I went to physical therapy for  the knees a few years ago one of the isometric exercises given to me was to tighten the front of the thighs, lifting the knee caps, hold the flex for five seconds and then relax.  I was taught to repeat this throughout the day five or ten times at a time–while waiting for an elevator, standing in line, anytime at all.    Now I do this in yoga instead. Blessings, Amy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – My knee caps are a weak point, they have been misused due to chondromalicia, they are certainly not straight and often feel really weird when resting. Sometimes it feels as though when the leg turns the knee caps dont, and my boyfriend is totally grossed out by the way I can wobble the caps with my hands .. Your upper leg has two sets of opposing muscles.  On the front of the leg the quads.  When you flex the quads the legs are straight.   The back of the leg is the hamstrings.  When you flex your hamstrings mostly the lower leg comes up and you sit.  In order to relax your hamstrings for the forward bend the instruction is to flex the quads (Pull up on the kneecap). Don’t worry about your chondromalicia.  By flexing your quads you will be giving your legs a nice isometric exercise.  You are also giving your poor hamstrings a break after their hard day of walking around and being sat upon. — ~Stu

Response:

I am glad to hear things are going so well. This may be of some help: Before you go into a forward bend. Standing in Tadasana.  Think about elongating the anterior (front) spine as well as the posterior spine.  So each disk is getting an equal stretch. I am not greatly experienced in feeling the front and back of the spine, is there any way you could expand on this for me, is the back the bottom and the front the top?  I understand if this is difficult to get into words…

My best yoga book is my anatomy book.  It helps me imagine what is going on as I practice. The back  of the spine is the part closest to your back skin. When you get a back massage the back spine is being touched. The front of the spine is facing your internal organs (Lungs, Kidneys, Intestines etc).  Great muscles hang from the front of your spine to give your skeleton stability as you move. The vertebrae are bones that are separated by a spongy material called the disc.  The vertebrae sit on top of each other. A forward bend with an arch of your back (flexion) the discs are compressed in the front and opened in the back.  A back bend (Hypextention) puts pressure on the back of the discs and opens the front. When standing in a neutral position imagine energy coming from your prenium (right between your legs) and running up your front spine through your throat and to the top or your head.  See if you can draw your inhalations up this path.  Exhale the energy down the back spine. Try to elongate your body so that each disk is getting an even stretch on the front and the back. Your back is straight elongated but not stiff. Keeping that stretch and bend forward without stressing any discs.  The "hinge" for the forward bend is between the legs (femor bones) and the pelvis.  The back should remain straight.  Become aware of where the back needs to arch as the forward bend happens. This is my sticking point with "Power Yoga" people.  It is important that one knows how much and where they are stressing their discs in a forward bend.  Uneven stress on these discs without proper preparation will lead to disc degeneration.  Because Power Yoga emphasizes continuous movement there is little time to really understand what is happening structurally. Your kneecaps should be tight, but not so much so that your legs are hyperexteneded. My knee caps are a weak point, they have been misused due to chondromalicia, they are certainly not straight and often feel really weird when resting. Sometimes it feels as though when the leg turns the knee caps dont, and my boyfriend is totally grossed out by the way I can wobble the caps with my hands ..

Your upper leg has two sets of opposing muscles.  On the front of the leg the quads.  When you flex the quads the legs are straight.   The back of the leg is the hamstrings.  When you flex your hamstrings mostly the lower leg comes up and you sit.  In order to relax your hamstrings for the forward bend the instruction is to flex the quads (Pull up on the kneecap). Don’t worry about your chondromalicia.  By flexing your quads you will be giving your legs a nice isometric exercise.  You are also giving your poor hamstrings a break after their hard day of walking around and being sat upon. — ~Stu

Response:

Can anybody suggest ways I could ensure my back does not bend when folding fowards. Currently I hold my hands behind my back near my bum. but I think it might squish my shoulders inwards. Also, should the knee caps be up and taught or hang down? thanking you kindly Sue

I am glad to hear things are going so well. This may be of some help: Before you go into a forward bend. Standing in Tadasana.  Think about elongating the anterior (front) spine as well as the posterior spine.  So each disk is getting an equal stretch. Your kneecaps should be tight, but not so much so that your legs are hyperexteneded. As you bend forward try to keep this balanced stretch.  It may help to put your hands in reverse namaste on your back.  If you can’t do that grab your elbows behind your back.  This will help you to keep your shoulders rolled and thorasic spine in. Take the forward bend until you can not longer guard the back from rounding. Perhaps hold a chair or put your hands on a wall and "play" with this part of the forward bend.  When done against a wall this is called "L" pose. At the point of "L" pose take a few breaths before going on. ***Interesting note on "L" pose against the wall:  You can do it laying on the floor with your legs up the wall (Viperita Karani).  Or both arms and legs on floor (Down Dog) or hands on floor and feet at wall (handstand variation).  All the same pose – just different use of gravity. If you have a healthy lower back.  You can continue the forward bend. At this point the posterior spine will be compressed more than the anterior. This can be damaging in people with spinal conditions. If you need a picture of this I can find something for you. — ~Stu

Response:

I am glad to hear things are going so well. This may be of some help: Before you go into a forward bend. Standing in Tadasana.  Think about elongating the anterior (front) spine as well as the posterior spine.  So each disk is getting an equal stretch.

I am not greatly experienced in feeling the front and back of the spine, is there any way you could expand on this for me, is the back the bottom and the front the top?  I understand if this is difficult to get into words… Your kneecaps should be tight, but not so much so that your legs are hyperexteneded.

My knee caps are a weak point, they have been misused due to chondromalicia, they are certainly not straight and often feel really weird when resting. Sometimes it feels as though when the leg turns the knee caps dont, and my boyfriend is totally grossed out by the way I can wobble the caps with my hands .. As you bend forward try to keep this balanced stretch.  It may help to put your hands in reverse namaste on your back.  If you can’t do that grab your elbows behind your back.  This will help you to keep your shoulders rolled and thorasic spine in.

Namaste is the prayer position? Palms together – I know I can do this behind my back. I will try this next time. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Take the forward bend until you can not longer guard the back from rounding. Perhaps hold a chair or put your hands on a wall and "play" with this part of the forward bend.  When done against a wall this is called "L" pose. At the point of "L" pose take a few breaths before going on. ***Interesting note on "L" pose against the wall:  You can do it laying on the floor with your legs up the wall (Viperita Karani).  Or both arms and legs on floor (Down Dog) or hands on floor and feet at wall (handstand variation).  All the same pose – just different use of gravity. If you have a healthy lower back.  You can continue the forward bend. At this point the posterior spine will be compressed more than the anterior. This can be damaging in people with spinal conditions.

I suspect my lower back is poor condition, I have back aches, work in an office, poor posture for many years – all of which I am working on improving… If you need a picture of this I can find something for you.

I would be very greatful if you could, you can email it direct to me difference also with normal stretched legs and hyperextended knees (I get the idea the knees are pushed right back till the legs bend the wrong way???) And lastly, when I start to fold/bend, I can feel my weight distribution through my feet change, and to ensure its even all through the feet, it kinda feels like I have to stick my bum backwards more….Do you have any idea what that may indicate.. I lied, this is lastly. how much warm up should one do before performing handstands? I love them – used to do them all the time as a kid and am now rekindling my ability to to a handstand and hold myself up rather than lean on a wall. Was even encouraged when my boyfriend (who is pretty fit – does press ups, army trained etc) tried and said he had trouble just holding his own weight up – perhaps young boys should do handstands in the playground instead of looking up girls skirts! ;0) Sue x – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text — ~Stu

Response:

Can anybody suggest ways I could ensure my back does not bend when folding fowards. Currently I hold my hands behind my back near my bum. but I think it might squish my shoulders inwards. Also, should the knee caps be up and taught or hang down? thanking you kindly Sue

Response:

Of course your back will bend, and your arms should be stretched out over head – down and through to the floor/ to the point of tension which is where yoga begins. The breathe with movement is key. By being concious of which lower back tilt u r in (cat or dog) gives more overall awareness and control. As i’m sure you already know Surya Namaskar is the mainstay to begin asanas. And/ or some gentle seated movements if you want to be really focused on shakti. Doubt doesn’t help the breath any , so make sure to come into it with full awareness so as not to make any wrong movemnts that can offset the focus! In (some forms) of Astanga the recommendation is to hold the "static contraction" of the thighs/around the knee aswell as moola and uddyana. I diverge from this, schooling for yoga to be much more of a subtle flowing vinyasa and spontaneous awareness rather than an outward display of endorphins, just like "hey look at me i can do this". I read in Power Yoga that  an axiom — "strentgh not gravity develops flexibilty" I disagree with this entirely, it is a combination of the two. Both strength and gravity work together, along with steady breathing, drsti, bandhas, to irrigate the system, to fill the spine with prana. Flexibilty has IMHO nothing to do with yoga in terms of progress. The process is the same wether u touch ur chin to your shins or not. I don’t know if i should bother posting this or not, does it answer any questions or is this just adding to the hype?? Feedback would be appreciated. — — peace be the journey —

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Can anybody suggest ways I could ensure my back does not bend when folding fowards. Currently I hold my hands behind my back near my bum. but I think it might squish my shoulders inwards. Also, should the knee caps be up and taught or hang down? thanking you kindly Sue

Response:

Who knows the history of hatha yoga?

Question:

Wonder no more, I shall give you the right answer regarding Hatha and Raja Yoga!  Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra is concerned with the higher meditative practices, therefore the comfortable sitting asanas associated with Raja Yoga.  Hatha Yoga Pradipika attempts to develop the body to the point of enabling higher meditative practice, it itself declares its intention as the FIRST line.  For the same reason when the founder of Chan/Zen Buddhism left India, he had all the monks start exercising and doing martial arts.  The temple developed into the Shaolin temple now famous in China for its kung fu.  It is imperative that the body be taken to the point where deep meditation is possible for prolonged periods.  This could happen for some outdoors types (hunters etc.) without much effort.  But for the rest, they have to resort to some kind of an exercise regimen, therefore the asanas of Hatha Yoga.  They are both yoga, one provides physical exercises to enable the meditative exercises.  End of story.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Insight a always your ignorance only surpasses your arrogance. Hatha yoga goes far beyond only asana practice. There is a diffrence in spelling between the word hatha yoga and asana practice. Many Hatha Yoga practices are defined in the Yoga Upanishads (which I am sure you have not read) as well as in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, Siva Samhita, Gherand Samhita, as well as many other ancient texts. Granted raj yoga as taught by Patanjali does not equal hatha yoga, yet the two are not incongruent. Now you may not be a practitioner of hatha yoga, but why do you feel a need to continually deprecate it unless you are insecure. IS this part of your "religiousl" practice? Does it pose a threat to you? Oh, forgive me for asking you a question, as I forgot, you do not anwser questions. Bigot:: Function: noun Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices. A narrow-minded intolerant or prejudiced person. A closeminded person who holds blindly AND intolerably to a particular opinion, creed, bias, etc. One of the main points which is almost completely overlooked is that Hatha Yoga is the least mentioned aspect of these numerous Hindu spiritual disciplines. Even Patanjali only says Sthirasukhamasanam or assume a steady, comfortable pose. Of course, this is done to meditate on the Atman or the Soul within and join with the Universal Soul.

Response:

Hatha Yoga is much more than just exercise in order to be able to sit in meditation longer. Raj Yoga is not concerned with the powerful techniques of manipulation of the pranas, pranayama, bandhas, mudras, laya, kundalini, etc., which if applied intelligently greatly accelerates the process of self realization, but it is not for everyone.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Wonder no more, I shall give you the right answer regarding Hatha and Raja Yoga!  Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra is concerned with the higher meditative practices, therefore the comfortable sitting asanas associated with Raja Yoga.  Hatha Yoga Pradipika attempts to develop the body to the point of enabling higher meditative practice, it itself declares its intention as the FIRST line.  For the same reason when the founder of Chan/Zen Buddhism left India, he had all the monks start exercising and doing martial arts.  The temple developed into the Shaolin temple now famous in China for its kung fu.  It is imperative that the body be taken to the point where deep meditation is possible for prolonged periods.  This could happen for some outdoors types (hunters etc.) without much effort.  But for the rest, they have to resort to some kind of an exercise regimen, therefore the asanas of Hatha Yoga.  They are both yoga, one provides physical exercises to enable the meditative exercises.  End of story.

Response:

Gheranda Samhita, Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Patanjali Yoga Sutras are all relatively recent works. Relative to the written word, any sincere student of the truth would be forced to disagree with you, since most every one who has studied this subject places the "Yoga Sutras" at approximately 2000 years old (plus or minus 200 years).

That in Hinduism is a relatively relative origin. Let me address the main fallacy that I read throughout your posts, Kunal Singh i.e., it seems that you are saying if it is old, then it is good, and if it is not old, then it is not valid or a bastard. Thus you have "assumed" a prejudice for the old, for lineage, tradition, or parama. That is your right, but it is merely a presumption and bias.

That is not a bias, that is a fact!  At least since 525 BC or so there has been very little done in terms of Hindu kings patronizing large gatherings of scholars and certainly nothing on the scale of the kind of long-term discussions held during the times of King Janaka.  The times of the Ramayana in terms of understanding Shiva/Shakti has never been bettered, not during the times of Buddhism and not even today. Yoga however like Indian art, dance, music, and literature was organic and creative (up until the time of the alien invasions from the West from the 13th century onward. As a result it is generally agreed that the genius and creativity of India which flowered while Europe was in the dark ages was severely dampened. The greatness of India’s genius and contribution to culture and spiritual thought was that it was continually renewed and evolving, not that it remained true to the past, otherwise all we would have is the testimony of the Rg Veda and nothing else. If one wishes to attribute this as "sufficient",  then that is their right, but I would rather call that both blind and arrogant at the same time, do you not think?

This sense that the knowledge of ancient times during the times of the Ramayana was more perfect is a well accepted fact by every Hindu scholar and tradition.  Over time generally knowledge was deemed to be lost not gained. This is likely the case, as even the large projects of those times were NEVER EQUALLED AGAIN!  There was never a Churning of the ocean of Upanisads again to discover the elixir of immortality!  There was never even anything on the material plane quite like the digging done to bring Ganga down from heaven to earth.  Such immense projects were never again undertaken.  And the present times are sadly a terrible joke in comparison. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –  Shiva points to the source of yoga’s understanding during ancient times of Vedic Hinduism when Yoga was still untested and not understood by Hindu society, thus Shiva battles the other deities of Hinduism to prove his supremacy.  Shiva and the Shaivite family of deities emerges victorious in the end.  Shiva is the deity of yoga in Hinduism. Much later Buddha knew of Shaivism and described it as a perfect crystal faith during his own times when one of his relatives asked him about the various paths.  The first Buddhist Arhats or perfect beings used to be meditative yogis who accompanied the Buddha.  Later such practices entered Buddhism due to Buddha having himself achieved nirvana through such ascetic Shaivite methods. In short, there is no Buddhist Yoga, there is no Kundalini Yoga, there is no Hatha Yoga, there is no Kriya Yoga, there is no Pranayama Yoga and there sure as hell is no Sahaja Yoga.  There is only Shiva/Shakti, and that is the most complete understanding of all ascetic disciplines, actually I would go as far as saying the most complete understanding of the universe. Whatever practices have entered other faiths whether they be Buddhist or Jain or Sikh they have not taken the whole, but only the parts.  So for them it is a puzzle, as they get information in pieces and are not quite sure how the various pieces relate and fit together. And there are others who say that Shiva taught the various yogas especailly because of the various type of mentalities and constitutions that exist — the various propensities and capabilities that exist in humankind. It is easy for you to speak for Shiva, but in reality no mortal can and that is the lesson of your arrogance again (which I hope, if you are fortunate,

Greenlight, you’re an idiot!  THERE IS NO ASCETIC YOGI IN ALL OF INDIA WHO DOES NOT PAY OBEISANCE TO SHIVA!  There may be a few fitness instructors in the cities, but as I’ve said they aren’t really ascetic yogis!  Anyone who speaks of yoga, which is synonymous with Shiva, and does not pay obeisance to the deity which brings the knowledge of yoga to them, should be taken to the highest peaks of the Himalayas and thrown down into the valleys below! Shiva will cut down to size). For example the hatha yoga founders say that they have learned the hatha yoga from Siva himself. A great Swami who taught Sahaj Yoga, told me that he learned it from Lakulish himself (a reincarnation of Shiva).  Likewise the same author (Shiva) is given credit in these other schools that you mention.

You cannot understand anything because you don’t know anything!  That doesn’t mean that other people cannot trace the roots of yoga!  Let me trace it for you, as you have no idea of even the difference between Hatha Yoga and Raja Yoga that they are different stages of the same thing.  Yogic ascetics have given their understanding of yoga and attributed it to the deity of yoga.  Devotees of Shakti have long since married them to understand their practices and bring them to society proper from the jungles and the mountains.  The reason why Shiva falls in love with Shakti as per legend is because he is fascinated by the explanative theory propounded by the Shakti cult, the Samkhya.  This is the reason why Shiva and Shakti "sport" on mountains for thousands of years developing new ideas.  Thus though the development of the conscious practice was best done by yogis, its understanding in the realm of the material world was best developed by the theorists of Samkhya, or the Shakti devotees. The tradition of all the Nathas comes from Dattatreya who speaks of the highest principles of Raja Yoga propounded in the courts of the ancient King Janaka himself according to the text Tripura Rahasya.  This is evident as the Nathas of Nepal worship Dattatreya.  Dattatreya quotes Janaka.  And within the courts of Janaka supposedly was also developed the entire concept of reincarnation of the self. Now the Shakti cult has learnt its yoga from Shiva devotees.  The early legends after the marriage of Shiva and Sati have Shiva instructing Sati in yoga practice.  Raja Yoga is considered the highest philosophy of yoga, and its implications on Hindu philosophy — including the implications of the various kinds of samadhi, awareness without form etc. — are well discussed. As for Hatha Yoga, it is nothing but the beginning steps to Raja Yoga.  How do I know ?  Am I just an arrogant Shaivite devotee which has figured out what nobody else has figured out ?  Yes, I have bothered to read the first line in the Hatha Yoga Pridipika which says that it is intended to eventually lead to the higher practice of Raja Yoga.  So you see the two are simply different stages of yoga, not two different kinds of yoga as is portrayed by the various moneymaking yoga "spiritual gurus" of India and the West. Thus many idiots have in the past and will tell you in the future that Hatha Yoga somehow originated in South India with Iyengar and it was influenced by the more physical culture of Madras.  While the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali originated somewhere in Bihar where people were probably too lazy to perform physical exercises!  But the fact of the matter is that the Yoga Sutras contain more meditative postures and the Hatha Yoga contains more body conditioning postures. If you have practiced yoga enough, you should KNOW that eventually the various asanas meant to improve circulation are not as significant as the meditative practices.  Once someone reaches the advanced stages of meditation he DOESN’T NEED the physical postures.  Their whole purpose is to prepare the body to lead to the meditative practice.  Once you can seize your chakras or feel them, most people spend more time attempting to circulate their energy while in meditative posture.  If being extremely flexible meant you were a greater yogi, then every woman and child would be a greater yogi than any man!  But the fact remains that once you achieve deeper meditative states, then the philosophical abstracts of the different states of consciousness becomes more important (i.e. the abstract philosophy of the Yoga Sutras). Who am I to say that these claims are justified or not, unless I claim that I can speak for Shiva?  Should I

I can say that these claims are totally unjustified and stupid and I deem myself justified in saying so!  There is only one yoga, that associated with Shiva, and its best explanation is that associated with Shakti!  End of story! .. Personally I celebrate the variegated and rich paths of yoga which are suitable for peoples of all constitutions and karmic propensities, be they Vedic,  agamic, or tantric.

There is no "Vedic, agamic, or tantric" yoga!  There is only one yoga, that of Shiva and Shakti! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – We can all benefit from practicing with sincerity, integrity, and supreme intensity upon our  paths to gain liberation, and part of that practice is neither waste time deriding the spiritual practices of others, nor bolstering or defending your own practice in arrogant pride. At least this is the recommendation of the

… read more »

Response:

Thank you, Greenlight. I am happy as a child. :-) Although I admit, I am far far from your knowledge and probably experience, I think I learned something great from your last message. It is lost of time trying to straiten the winding river – about disability to explain and shout to the whole universe what my little I feels for Him. But indeed, His teachings are uncorruptable and eternal. With this thought, dancing like a butterfly, I salute you wishing you all best. Sincerely Jharna

Response:

Dear Zeljka, Please forgive "me" for misreading your intent. Yes, the post could be read in many ways, and your very clear post makes it clear. I hope that "my" reaction was not the stimulus for any "pain". Having studied yoga far before the modern fad of yoga — when the word, "yoga",  was known as more than physical exercise and " ashtanga yoga" was known in context as the eight limbs as taught by Patanjali in the "Yoga Sutras" versus what it is commonly known as today, I too (many years ago) tried to "educate" the newbies, tried to defend these words which represented such high ideals from the fragmentary forces of our time, and long ago questioned what has now become the new "conventional wisdom" belonging to our times. After a lot of grieving and effort, I realized that although the meaning of  these "words" have become corrupted in the West, but that the actual teachings are uncorruptable and eternal. I realized that ignorant, fearful, needy, and corrupted people will continue their ways until wisdom is found, fear is defeated — a passion for  wholeness and completion is embraced and for me to argue or try to change them through force would not be appropriate. Here I share the truth and context in regards to yoga as best I can– according to my meager ability and understanding-  for  those who are true seekers after that, who are sincere,  or are in need. Also here I listen to those who have something to share — people of good heart and intention — who have had the courage to open their minds and hearts —  like you. Elsewise,  I try to have compassion, love,  and patience when I hear bigotry, hatred, prejudice, pretension, deceit, delusion, and falsehood — trying as much skill as I can master to bring such into light and love — to be centered in light and abide there forever. This is something our "spiritual" friends help "remind" us and serve to bring us more fully into the Heart when we wander or go astray.  Thank you, your message has acted as such. Hari Om Tat Sat

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Dear Greenlight, I would like to apologize myself if I sounded cynical or somehow rude in my post. It really wasn`t my intention, and I bid your forgiveness. It is silly, but, you know, accidentally I signed this NG hoping to find…I don`t really know what. And what I read every day astonishes me. I don`t know if American society could understand this, as you already mentioned this somewhere, people differ, but I was never in my life able to see so much money involved with the word yoga. So much different stuff made out of the same thing. So much discussing God, and not sharing your inner experience. Right when somebody writes down what he feels, there are the same names next day analyzing his or her every word, not respecting this personality, or his or her choice of guru or school or…(just like you denied my guru calling him external teacher, which I understand isn`t something good). Just now I understand there are many paths toward God, just like many different samskaras among us. Each one is made by Him for us. And if we feel love for some external teacher, it is God what we see and love in this teacher. It is God we meditate on. Just like you said He is in us, He is also in everyone else. If we accept this, not first, but at least – also, I think there wouldn`t be so much disapproval in this world. I don`t think that any of the realized souls ever bowed down to themselves, rather they shared what they accomplished, and with their love and approval made an example. Try to imagine the world with everyone hugging each other and sharing support, feeling interested in what God is for this other man, to know better another face of His. This makes you closer to Him, not what you know, but what you don`t know. When one knows everything, I feel one becomes He. Philosophy is in vain without His mercy. I wrote what I feel, so please, don`t find anything against yourself, because everything speaks just opposite. I deeply respect yours and everyone`s thoughts, and also bow to God which dwells in your soul. I just wanted to apologize if I disturbed you, and humbly wanted to share something little… Namaskar to Haribhakta from Canada and to everybody else. Jharna

Response:

Insight a always your ignorance only surpasses your arrogance. Hatha yoga goes far beyond only asana practice. There is a diffrence in spelling between the word hatha yoga and asana practice. Many Hatha Yoga practices are defined in the Yoga Upanishads (which I am sure you have not read) as well as in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, Siva Samhita, Gherand Samhita, as well as many other ancient texts. Granted raj yoga as taught by Patanjali does not equal hatha yoga, yet the two are not incongruent. Now you may not be a practitioner of hatha yoga, but why do you feel a need to continually deprecate it unless you are insecure. IS this part of your "religiousl" practice? Does it pose a threat to you? Oh, forgive me for asking you a question, as I forgot, you do not anwser questions. Bigot:: Function: noun Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices. A narrow-minded intolerant or prejudiced person. A closeminded person who holds blindly AND intolerably to a particular opinion, creed, bias, etc.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – One of the main points which is almost completely overlooked is that Hatha Yoga is the least mentioned aspect of these numerous Hindu spiritual disciplines. Even Patanjali only says Sthirasukhamasanam or assume a steady, comfortable pose. Of course, this is done to meditate on the Atman or the Soul within and join with the Universal Soul.

Response:

One of the main points which is almost completely overlooked is that Hatha Yoga is the least mentioned aspect of these numerous Hindu spiritual disciplines. Even Patanjali only says Sthirasukhamasanam or assume a steady, comfortable pose. Of course, this is done to meditate on the Atman or the Soul within and join with the Universal Soul. The vital foundation for this Spiritual Realization is Karma Yoga and Bhakti Yoga (Patanjali’s Yama and Niyama). The great Hindu sages realized what so many miss today. In the pursuit of the physical, the Spiritual intent has suffered. Today most think that "yoga" is just another exercise routine when nothing could be further from the Truth.

Response:

Dear Greenlight, I would like to apologize myself if I sounded cynical or somehow rude in my post. It really wasn`t my intention, and I bid your forgiveness. It is silly, but, you know, accidentally I signed this NG hoping to find…I don`t really know what. And what I read every day astonishes me. I don`t know if American society could understand this, as you already mentioned this somewhere, people differ, but I was never in my life able to see so much money involved with the word yoga. So much different stuff made out of the same thing. So much discussing God, and not sharing your inner experience. Right when somebody writes down what he feels, there are the same names next day analyzing his or her every word, not respecting this personality, or his or her choice of guru or school or…(just like you denied my guru calling him external teacher, which I understand isn`t something good). Just now I understand there are many paths toward God, just like many different samskaras among us. Each one is made by Him for us. And if we feel love for some external teacher, it is God what we see and love in this teacher. It is God we meditate on. Just like you said He is in us, He is also in everyone else. If we accept this, not first, but at least – also, I think there wouldn`t be so much disapproval in this world. I don`t think that any of the realized souls ever bowed down to themselves, rather they shared what they accomplished, and with their love and approval made an example. Try to imagine the world with everyone hugging each other and sharing support, feeling interested in what God is for this other man, to know better another face of His. This makes you closer to Him, not what you know, but what you don`t know. When one knows everything, I feel one becomes He. Philosophy is in vain without His mercy. I wrote what I feel, so please, don`t find anything against yourself, because everything speaks just opposite. I deeply respect yours and everyone`s thoughts, and also bow to God which dwells in your soul. I just wanted to apologize if I disturbed you, and humbly wanted to share something little… Namaskar to Haribhakta from Canada and to everybody else. Jharna – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Zeljka, thank you for your advice, but it was unsolicited. Do you know what we call unsolicited advice? As I hope you will find out, Shiva is not to be found in books.  I can sincerely  assure you that I have checked out Ananda Marga over 30 years ago. It is easy to follow and parrot and conform to  what some one else says or what is in books, but such is at best superficial and as well as a source of continued  bondage and pain. Although I have studied with "authentic" Shaivite  teachers (some had tens of thousands of disciples both in India and elsewhere), one eventually discovers that  the real quest is to develop a living inner spiritual relationship — a dialogue with the inner wisdom/teacher so that we know DESPITE the efforts of an overgrown intellect — Shiva. Calling Shiva into your life is good. I am happy for you!  Authentic teachers point a sincere student in that direction (toward the innate wisdom beyond manmade beliedf systems, creeds, prejudice, pride, and bigotry), not toward books or "external" teachers. To that teacher I bow down in obeisance and none other. Namaste!

Response:

Dear Greenlight, as you really understand so much, I guess you`ve read many books (also). But, sincerely I recommend, if you want to know Shiva, try "Namah` Sivaya Santaya" written by Srii Srii Anandamurti or Sri Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. I don`t know what is the condition of finding his books in the States, but try Him. He will quench your thirst with any book. Jharna

Zeljka, thank you for your advice, but it was unsolicited. Do you know what we call unsolicited advice? As I hope you will find out, Shiva is not to be found in books.  I can sincerely  assure you that I have checked out Ananda Marga over 30 years ago. It is easy to follow and parrot and conform to  what some one else says or what is in books, but such is at best superficial and as well as a source of continued  bondage and pain. Although I have studied with "authentic" Shaivite  teachers (some had tens of thousands of disciples both in India and elsewhere), one eventually discovers that  the real quest is to develop a living inner spiritual relationship — a dialogue with the inner wisdom/teacher so that we know DESPITE the efforts of an overgrown intellect — Shiva. Calling Shiva into your life is good. I am happy for you!  Authentic teachers point a sincere student in that direction (toward the innate wisdom beyond manmade beliedf systems, creeds, prejudice, pride, and bigotry), not toward books or "external" teachers. To that teacher I bow down in obeisance and none other. Namaste!

Response:

Dear Greenlight, as you really understand so much, I guess you`ve read many books (also). But, sincerely I recommend, if you want to know Shiva, try "Namah` Sivaya Santaya" written by Srii Srii Anandamurti or Sri Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. I don`t know what is the condition of finding his books in the States, but try Him. He will quench your thirst with any book. Jharna

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Gheranda Samhita, Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Patanjali Yoga Sutras are all relatively recent works. Relative to the written word, any sincere student of the truth would be forced to disagree with you, since most every one who has studied this subject places the "Yoga Sutras" at approximately 2000 years old (plus or minus 200 years). Let me address the main fallacy that I read throughout your posts, Kunal Singh i.e., it seems that you are saying if it is old, then it is good, and if it is not old, then it is not valid or a bastard. Thus you have "assumed" a prejudice for the old, for lineage, tradition, or parama. That is your right, but it is merely a presumption and bias. Yoga however like Indian art, dance, music, and literature was organic and creative (up until the time of the alien invasions from the West from the 13th century onward. As a result it is generally agreed that the genius and creativity of India which flowered while Europe was in the dark ages was severely dampened. The greatness of India’s genius and contribution to culture and spiritual thought was that it was continually renewed and evolving, not that it remained true to the past, otherwise all we would have is the testimony of the Rg Veda and nothing else. If one wishes to attribute this as "sufficient",  then that is their right, but I would rather call that both blind and arrogant at the same time, do you not think?  Shiva points to the source of yoga’s understanding during ancient times of Vedic Hinduism when Yoga was still untested and not understood by Hindu society, thus Shiva battles the other deities of Hinduism to prove his supremacy.  Shiva and the Shaivite family of deities emerges victorious in the end.  Shiva is the deity of yoga in Hinduism. Much later Buddha knew of Shaivism and described it as a perfect crystal faith during his own times when one of his relatives asked him about the various paths.  The first Buddhist Arhats or perfect beings used to be meditative yogis who accompanied the Buddha.  Later such practices entered Buddhism due to Buddha having himself achieved nirvana through such ascetic Shaivite methods. In short, there is no Buddhist Yoga, there is no Kundalini Yoga, there is no Hatha Yoga, there is no Kriya Yoga, there is no Pranayama Yoga and there sure as hell is no Sahaja Yoga.  There is only Shiva/Shakti, and that is the most complete understanding of all ascetic disciplines, actually I would go as far as saying the most complete understanding of the universe. Whatever practices have entered other faiths whether they be Buddhist or Jain or Sikh they have not taken the whole, but only the parts.  So for them it is a puzzle, as they get information in pieces and are not quite sure how the various pieces relate and fit together. And there are others who say that Shiva taught the various yogas especailly because of the various type of mentalities and constitutions that exist — the various propensities and capabilities that exist in humankind. It is easy for you to speak for Shiva, but in reality no mortal can and that is the lesson of your arrogance again (which I hope, if you are fortunate, Shiva will cut down to size). For example the hatha yoga founders say that they have learned the hatha yoga from Siva himself. A great Swami who taught Sahaj Yoga, told me that he learned it from Lakulish himself (a reincarnation of Shiva).  Likewise the same author (Shiva) is given credit in these other schools that you mention.  Who am I to say that these claims are justified or not, unless I claim that I can speak for Shiva?  Should I set myself as judge, I would be as arrogant as you and thus stray even further from the path, my friend. I encourage you to place the emotion, intent, and motivation of your posts  to the test of Shiva’s light and free yourself from any remnant of  pride, anger, hatred, and ignorance. When we ridicule another, we de-value, demean, marginalize, de-humanize another — Actually such ridicule is most often another attempt to condemn another while praising oneself. When we deem them less worthy than our self or of our own cherished opinion or views, we actually defend our views while attacking the "adversary" using such methods. Let us give up the disguise, mask, and ghost of self deceit and delusion and we will all become richer for it in the end, yes? Personally I celebrate the variegated and rich paths of yoga which are suitable for peoples of all constitutions and karmic propensities, be they Vedic,  agamic, or tantric. We can all benefit from practicing with sincerity, integrity, and supreme intensity upon our  paths to gain liberation, and part of that practice is neither waste time deriding the spiritual practices of others, nor bolstering or defending your own practice in arrogant pride. At least this is the recommendation of the Rishis and Munis as I understand it. Do you not agree? What I wish to do with my energy (feeble as it is in comparson to the saints and Rishis) is to share my meager 35 years of yogic practice and study with others (especially with those who are just starting). Anybody who has lived both in India and the West, knows that the cultures are very different, the psychological conditioning vastly incongruent, and thus the samskaras are different while the kleshas masked in diffrent dramas, so then (if I undesrtand you correctly?)  do you propose that utilizing 5000 year old teachings without any modifications from an entirely different era and culture will  be effective in liberating the modern Westerner from the bonds of his/her afflictions, or do you propose a different more positive approach? What is your problem with the varied kinds of yoga and what do you propose as a more effective path and why? Jai Ram!

Response:

Gheranda Samhita, Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Patanjali Yoga Sutras are all relatively recent works.

Relative to the written word, any sincere student of the truth would be forced to disagree with you, since most every one who has studied this subject places the "Yoga Sutras" at approximately 2000 years old (plus or minus 200 years). Let me address the main fallacy that I read throughout your posts, Kunal Singh i.e., it seems that you are saying if it is old, then it is good, and if it is not old, then it is not valid or a bastard. Thus you have "assumed" a prejudice for the old, for lineage, tradition, or parama. That is your right, but it is merely a presumption and bias. Yoga however like Indian art, dance, music, and literature was organic and creative (up until the time of the alien invasions from the West from the 13th century onward. As a result it is generally agreed that the genius and creativity of India which flowered while Europe was in the dark ages was severely dampened. The greatness of India’s genius and contribution to culture and spiritual thought was that it was continually renewed and evolving, not that it remained true to the past, otherwise all we would have is the testimony of the Rg Veda and nothing else. If one wishes to attribute this as "sufficient",  then that is their right, but I would rather call that both blind and arrogant at the same time, do you not think? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –  Shiva points to the source of yoga’s understanding during ancient times of Vedic Hinduism when Yoga was still untested and not understood by Hindu society, thus Shiva battles the other deities of Hinduism to prove his supremacy.  Shiva and the Shaivite family of deities emerges victorious in the end.  Shiva is the deity of yoga in Hinduism. Much later Buddha knew of Shaivism and described it as a perfect crystal faith during his own times when one of his relatives asked him about the various paths.  The first Buddhist Arhats or perfect beings used to be meditative yogis who accompanied the Buddha.  Later such practices entered Buddhism due to Buddha having himself achieved nirvana through such ascetic Shaivite methods. In short, there is no Buddhist Yoga, there is no Kundalini Yoga, there is no Hatha Yoga, there is no Kriya Yoga, there is no Pranayama Yoga and there sure as hell is no Sahaja Yoga.  There is only Shiva/Shakti, and that is the most complete understanding of all ascetic disciplines, actually I would go as far as saying the most complete understanding of the universe. Whatever practices have entered other faiths whether they be Buddhist or Jain or Sikh they have not taken the whole, but only the parts.  So for them it is a puzzle, as they get information in pieces and are not quite sure how the various pieces relate and fit together.

And there are others who say that Shiva taught the various yogas especailly because of the various type of mentalities and constitutions that exist — the various propensities and capabilities that exist in humankind. It is easy for you to speak for Shiva, but in reality no mortal can and that is the lesson of your arrogance again (which I hope, if you are fortunate, Shiva will cut down to size). For example the hatha yoga founders say that they have learned the hatha yoga from Siva himself. A great Swami who taught Sahaj Yoga, told me that he learned it from Lakulish himself (a reincarnation of Shiva).  Likewise the same author (Shiva) is given credit in these other schools that you mention.  Who am I to say that these claims are justified or not, unless I claim that I can speak for Shiva?  Should I set myself as judge, I would be as arrogant as you and thus stray even further from the path, my friend. I encourage you to place the emotion, intent, and motivation of your posts  to the test of Shiva’s light and free yourself from any remnant of  pride, anger, hatred, and ignorance. When we ridicule another, we de-value, demean, marginalize, de-humanize another — Actually such ridicule is most often another attempt to condemn another while praising oneself. When we deem them less worthy than our self or of our own cherished opinion or views, we actually defend our views while attacking the "adversary" using such methods. Let us give up the disguise, mask, and ghost of self deceit and delusion and we will all become richer for it in the end, yes? Personally I celebrate the variegated and rich paths of yoga which are suitable for peoples of all constitutions and karmic propensities, be they Vedic,  agamic, or tantric. We can all benefit from practicing with sincerity, integrity, and supreme intensity upon our  paths to gain liberation, and part of that practice is neither waste time deriding the spiritual practices of others, nor bolstering or defending your own practice in arrogant pride. At least this is the recommendation of the Rishis and Munis as I understand it. Do you not agree? What I wish to do with my energy (feeble as it is in comparson to the saints and Rishis) is to share my meager 35 years of yogic practice and study with others (especially with those who are just starting). Anybody who has lived both in India and the West, knows that the cultures are very different, the psychological conditioning vastly incongruent, and thus the samskaras are different while the kleshas masked in diffrent dramas, so then (if I undesrtand you correctly?)  do you propose that utilizing 5000 year old teachings without any modifications from an entirely different era and culture will  be effective in liberating the modern Westerner from the bonds of his/her afflictions, or do you propose a different more positive approach? What is your problem with the varied kinds of yoga and what do you propose as a more effective path and why? Jai Ram!

Response:

Shiva has a special quality. In most schools the energy of  Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are given specific attributes. Most traditional yoga schools however take the Shiva energy as the guide. Shiva/Kali/Durga is more about let go, surrender, or what is sometimes called dissolution or death, but the yogi knows that when something dies, then there is space created — that sacred space is the yogi’s auldron  –Shiva is also thus worshipped by the meditator. There  are entire books dedicated toward trying to explain who Shiva is, but Shiva can not be found in a book. If we see Shiva as a primary eternal DYNAMIC of the universe, we get closer to the deeper meaning behind of the word, pictures, and other symbolic representations. Right you are that  in one sense, there is no disconnection behind the matrix of illusion– but in another sense there exists a process or gate (gateless as it may be)  that we must pass through from duality into "THAT" and for many (the Shaivite and many yogis for example) that process is Shiva and none other. Jai Ma!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ken, <<<Shiva is the Supreme Infinite, the Source! Regards Ken Is Shiva not simply just a name, chosen by Shaivites? Is there in reality a difference between Shiva and Brahman, or Allah or Heavenly Father, or Tao, or Buddha Nature? Raja

Response:

Gheranda Samhita, Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Patanjali Yoga Sutras are all relatively recent works.  Shiva points to the source of yoga’s understanding during ancient times of Vedic Hinduism when Yoga was still untested and not understood by Hindu society, thus Shiva battles the other deities of Hinduism to prove his supremacy.  Shiva and the Shaivite family of deities emerges victorious in the end.  Shiva is the deity of yoga in Hinduism. Much later Buddha knew of Shaivism and described it as a perfect crystal faith during his own times when one of his relatives asked him about the various paths.  The first Buddhist Arhats or perfect beings used to be meditative yogis who accompanied the Buddha.  Later such practices entered Buddhism due to Buddha having himself achieved nirvana through such ascetic Shaivite methods. In short, there is no Buddhist Yoga, there is no Kundalini Yoga, there is no Hatha Yoga, there is no Kriya Yoga, there is no Pranayama Yoga and there sure as hell is no Sahaja Yoga.  There is only Shiva/Shakti, and that is the most complete understanding of all ascetic disciplines, actually I would go as far as saying the most complete understanding of the universe.  Whatever practices have entered other faiths whether they be Buddhist or Jain or Sikh they have not taken the whole, but only the parts.  So for them it is a puzzle, as they get information in pieces and are not quite sure how the various pieces relate and fit together.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So much for Yogeshwara Gheranda. The Shiva Samhita is considered to be written somewhat before the time of the "Gheranda Samhita" — sorry I do not have access a suitable library here, but even if I did I am sure that there would be controversy over the exact date. It too as the title of the book depicts is a discourse from Siva, the Supreme Yogeshwara. Because of many surviving texts that speak about the Life of Goraknath and Matsyendranath (who some associated with the Buddhist Mahasiddha Mina as well as Luipa) their dates can easily be put in the latter part of the tenth century. From similar sources, one must assume that Hatha Yoga did exist before Matsyendranath however he and Goraknath are credited with much of its "development", systemization, or at least the earliest written texts (as it appears to have been an oral tradition before that. It should be noted that the Hatha Yoga books are all imprecise acting as a supplemental  guide assuming that you are using your own practice and meditation to unveil its secretes (or maybe if you we are fortunate a living teacher). .   .

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I would like to know more about history of hatha yoga. I found out that here, in The Netherlands, many people pretend to know much about Hatha Yoga but don’t know where it comes from. I read that Gorakhnath was a major founder of hatha yoga. Can some one tell me when he lived and what he wrote? Does somebody know  when and by whom the Siva Samhita and Geranda Samhita were written? Thank you for your information, Irene. Before you buy.

Response:

Raja; Yes, this medium takes a little getting used to (mainly because there is no direct eye contact and people do not have the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and smiles (or lack thereof). Intonation thus is in the ear of the beholder and in many cases you will find that it is best to give the sender the "benefit of the doubt". Yes, there are angry and disturbed people here as well. I was trying to make a point how important it is to listen to the body (especially pain) as an important if not coarse message (as a result of us missing the more subtle mind/body dialogue). This was not intended to be  at your expense. But it was "instructive" (in my view) because your type of experience unfortunately is far too frequent i.e., people give themselves pain, stress, and "dis-ease" all the time. Yoga as you now practice it is aimed at reversing this tendency toward tightness/stress,  force, self abuse,  and tension, and I was happy that you shared your experience. Indeed pain and illness is not a laughing matter and you do have my complete sympathy (been there myself although not that particular place). Now, it is to your credit that instead of giving up yoga or blaming it, you decided to customize/modify  your program. This is wonderful and may I add authentic. So how did you come to that? From ramping up the inner dialogue or from expert external guidance? What I am doing here is not only asking you to share your process, but also I was trying to understand what you meant by saying that  forward bends of any kind being was dangerous without expert supervision? My particular character is such that when I hear what appears to be contradiction, I investigate further. It is meant in a personal way. Likewise, you said: Besides, I am quite emotional about the amount of pain and suffering that I endured for several years because I persisted in trying the Soorya Namaskar, of which the forward swing-bend is a very important part. And it took me years to realize that the Soorya Namaskar is the acme, the epitome, of the yogi’s art. It is meant neither for a beginner nor as a warmup, in my painfully learned opinion. Raja p.s. I have changed the title of my message from the original thread title, and perhaps we all ought to do the same because the original thread may have borne a certain title yet the subject constantly changes.

You know, there are many versions of Surya Namaskar. The most popular one in the states now is the one that is taught by the Patabi Jois tradition. Do you mean that one? There is a much more gentler one (without the standing warrior poses and cattaranga dandasana) that is given in the Sivananda tradition which was the most common Surya Namaskar around twenty years ago. There are other versions as well, but all that I know give the forward standing stretch (uttanasana). They are meant as warm ups, but IMHO the instructor must emphacize that touching the toes or keeping the knees locked is only right for "some" people, yes. If the instructor encourages people to S L O W L Y warm up and not do the full stretches the first few rounds, this may help any goal oriented (no pain -no gain) people refrain from the tendency of continuing to stress and hurt themselves. In this way the speed of surya namaskar and its depth will naturally unfold from the inner intelligence out. There are many lessons in yoga (not just for the body) but in regards our attitudes in life, psychology, and  lifestyle and effective asana practice is a great place to have this develope and integrate. So what version of Surya Namaskar were you practising, what type of "classical yoga" were you doing, and again who is qualified to supervise? Please read-in this question an inquiring tone– eyes wide open – quizzical smile on face   :-) Namaste!

Response:

I wanted to add to my previous response that Siva is considered to be the founder of Yoga. "The history of Hatha Yoga is usually associated with the Medieval India 7th-13th century where both yoga and tantra were blossoming. The historians call this the eclectic period  of the great Mahasiddhas  where many of the teachers no longer associated themselves with any "ism" or religion. This included Matysendranath who is generally considered to be the father of hatha yoga and whose disciple was Goraknath.  Matsyendranath is also considered to be the same mahasiddha Luipa and there is a temple outside Katmandu that is dedicated to him and which is both Hindu and Buddhist. This took place during a very  peaceful period of Indian history and which became severely disrupted during the many Mogul invasions in the 14-16th centuries wiping out Buddhism and much Yoga tantra from the Sub-Indian continent (many of it went to Tibet and Nepal where the Moslems did not go). It seems that Tibetan seekers came down to India since the 8th century for teachers/teachings and much of this yoga was then safely brought there. Thus most Tibetan yoga lineages trace their lineage to this time. Indian life was transformed by the invaders and most agree that its heyday was pre-invasion India. The surviving Nath Sect who takes Goraknath as their founder is a very watered down version of the yoga of this period (some say reformed). I have been told that it is almost impossible to find an existing competent Nath teacher (see "The Alchemical Body: Siddha Traditions in Medieval India"  by David Gordon White, Univ. of Chicago, 1996 for more.) Some classical texts are preserved in Tibetan (but Tibetan yogis are rare in the West and they do not readily teach this to beginners). Other texts such as the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Gherand Samhita, the Shat Karma Sangraha, the Gorakhpadhanti, The Goraksa-sataka, the Siva Samhita, and the Gherand Samhita are available in English by various translators. These vary in date from the 15th century to 18th century and give the general practices of the shat karmas, asana, pranayama, mudra, bandha, concentration (dharana) and meditation (dhyana) in order to achieve samadhi. Most  of then deal with balancing the pranas in the ida/pingala and bringing the energy in harmony so that it flows in a special non-dual way in the core psychic nerve called sushumna. The texts agree on this awakening (called kundalini) which is to be done gradually over time through consistent practice. There exist  a few other hatha yoga texts that are available in English translation. see George Feuerstein’s,  "The Yoga Tradition". See http://www.hubcom.com/tantric/ for more Nath texts in translation on the web. Also http://www.parkline.ru/Library/win/URIKOVA/SANTEM/SVATMARAMA/hyp.txt had the complete English translation of  the hatha yoga Pradipika, but right now it seems to be down. Swami Sivananda’s translation of the Yoga Kundalini Upanishad can be found on http://www.sivanandadlshq.org/download/download.htm The entire corpus of works called the "Yoga Upanishads" have also been translated into English (which deal with these same practices). For more see:  Yoga : Mastering Secrets of Matter and the Universe by Alain Danielou. Please take this as a brief sketch. there are books in English that are written about this period, Goraknath, etc should you be interested further."

Response:

Greenlight, you did post lots of good info. on this post. However, I wish you had not started it with "who knows" because it is a kind of a taunt, a challenge, saying to people, gee, did you know this..well, if not, here it is, kind of tone. Also at this point I wish to say as a relative newcomer to this newsgroup, I find that you very easily attack and jump on people on their posts and show very little friendliness and compassion. It is not becoming of a Yogi. Shiva did not found yoga, Greenlight, it is the Supreme Infinite who’s fragment resides within you, that "founded" yoga. It is all a process of physical and mental evolution back into our Source, is it not….there was and is not a "founder." Raja

Response:

Ken, <<<Shiva is the Supreme Infinite, the Source! Regards Ken Is Shiva not simply just a name, chosen by Shaivites? Is there in reality a difference between Shiva and Brahman, or Allah or Heavenly Father, or Tao, or Buddha Nature? Raja

Response:

Greenlight, <<<Because you are a newcomer, I forgive you. If you look at my post I did not use the word who knows at all rather  it was some body else’s post. I just responded to it. Newsgroups automatically put in the original title preceded by the prefix, RE: I hope this helps you to understand? That was a *horrible* mistake on my part, and I do convey my extreme regret. <<< I re-read the post in question andcould not find any tinge of being offensive or aggressive –rather I thought my suggestions were being helpful. Funny that you could "interpret" this as an attack. No the comments I made were about other posts that I have seen you made. Agree it was not in an appropriate place at all. But what I was referring to was elsewhere. For instance, in our dialogue about the back and forward bends, clearly a better understanding has developed. However your first response to my post was a searing scathing attack on my judgment and understanding and it was a very condescending reply. Agree, very often we post things that only show a fragment of our understanding, and I am guilty of that. It sometimes requires a whole page to explain a point, and I may not have expressed it well. Besides, I am quite emotional about the amount of pain and suffering that I endured for several years because I persisted in trying the Soorya Namaskar, of which the forward swing-bend is a very important part. And it took me years to realize that the Soorya Namaskar is the acme, the epitome, of the yogi’s art. It is meant neither for a beginner nor as a warmup, in my painfully learned opinion. Raja p.s. I have changed the title of my message from the original thread title, and perhaps we all ought to do the same because the original thread may have borne a certain title yet the subject constantly changes.

Response:

So much for Yogeshwara Gheranda. The Shiva Samhita is considered to be written somewhat before the time of the "Gheranda Samhita" — sorry I do not have access a suitable library here, but even if I did I am sure that there would be controversy over the exact date. It too as the title of the book depicts is a discourse from Siva, the Supreme Yogeshwara. Because of many surviving texts that speak about the Life of Goraknath and Matsyendranath (who some associated with the Buddhist Mahasiddha Mina as well as Luipa) their dates can easily be put in the latter part of the tenth century. From similar sources, one must assume that Hatha Yoga did exist before Matsyendranath however he and Goraknath are credited with much of its "development", systemization, or at least the earliest written texts (as it appears to have been an oral tradition before that. It should be noted that the Hatha Yoga books are all imprecise acting as a supplemental  guide assuming that you are using your own practice and meditation to unveil its secretes (or maybe if you we are fortunate a living teacher). .   . – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I would like to know more about history of hatha yoga. I found out that here, in The Netherlands, many people pretend to know much about Hatha Yoga but don’t know where it comes from. I read that Gorakhnath was a major founder of hatha yoga. Can some one tell me when he lived and what he wrote? Does somebody know  when and by whom the Siva Samhita and Geranda Samhita were written? Thank you for your information, Irene. Before you buy.

Response:

Shiva is the Supreme Infinite, the Source! Regards Ken – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Greenlight, you did post lots of good info. on this post. However, I wish you had not started it with "who knows" because it is a kind of a taunt, a challenge, saying to people, gee, did you know this..well, if not, here it is, kind of tone. Also at this point I wish to say as a relative newcomer to this newsgroup, I find that you very easily attack and jump on people on their posts and show very little friendliness and compassion. It is not becoming of a Yogi. Shiva did not found yoga, Greenlight, it is the Supreme Infinite who’s fragment resides within you, that "founded" yoga. It is all a process of physical and mental evolution back into our Source, is it not….there was and is not a "founder." Raja

Response:

Eh! keep on reading. I would like to know more about history of hatha yoga. I found out that here, in The Netherlands, many people pretend to know much about Hatha Yoga but don’t know where it comes from. I read that Gorakhnath was a major founder of hatha yoga. Can some one tell me when he lived and what he wrote? Does somebody know  when and by whom the Siva Samhita and Geranda Samhita were written? Thank you for your information, Irene.

– It is of immense importance to learn to laugh at ourselves. –Katherine Mansfield//////Question of the day. Different schools & conceptions? Before you buy.

Response:

Raja, Because you are a newcomer, I forgive you. If you look at my post I did not use the word who knows at all rather  it was some body else’s post. I just responded to it. Newsgroups automatically put in the original title preceded by the prefix, RE: I hope this helps you to understand?  I re-read the post in question andcould not find any tinge of being offensive or aggressive –rather I thought my suggestions were being helpful. Funny that you could "interpret" this as an attack.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Greenlight, you did post lots of good info. on this post. However, I wish you had not started it with "who knows" because it is a kind of a taunt, a challenge, saying to people, gee, did you know this..well, if not, here it is, kind of tone. Also at this point I wish to say as a relative newcomer to this newsgroup, I find that you very easily attack and jump on people on their posts and show very little friendliness and compassion. It is not becoming of a Yogi. Shiva did not found yoga, Greenlight, it is the Supreme Infinite who’s fragment resides within you, that "founded" yoga. It is all a process of physical and mental evolution back into our Source, is it not….there was and is not a "founder." Raja

Response:

Irene, To be more specific as to Gherand, the Gherand Samhita starts with a visit by Candakapli to the hut of the Yogeshwari, Gheranda asking for guidance in yoga, but according to Swami Kuvalayaananda, the exact author is not known. There are copies in Bengali on palm leaves  that are dated in the 18th century. It is generally considered to have been written after the Hatha Yoga Pradipika (which is dated between the 14th-16th centuries) because it references that prior work. Most then place the Gherand Samhita to be at the end of the 17th century or at the beginning of the 18th century. The Gherand Samhita describes the practices of 21 different satkarmas, 32 asanas, 25 mudras, 5 pratyharas, 10 pranayams, 3 dhayanas, and six samadhis.  At the end of the Gherand Samhita, Gherand says: " Siva has declared in various ways the secret Truth, the exalted Laya. I have told you briefly about all of  them which lead to Mukti. In this way Canda,  have told you about Samadhi which signifies Mukti. The essence of Rajayoga and Samadhi is becoming one with Atman…" Gheranda Samhita", translated by the Kaivalyadhama staff, Lonavala, Maharasthra, India, 1978. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I would like to know more about history of hatha yoga. I found out that here, in The Netherlands, many people pretend to know much about Hatha Yoga but don’t know where it comes from. I read that Gorakhnath was a major founder of hatha yoga. Can some one tell me when he lived and what he wrote? Does somebody know  when and by whom the Siva Samhita and Geranda Samhita were written? Thank you for your information, Irene. Before you buy.

Response:

I would like to know more about history of hatha yoga. I found out that here, in The Netherlands, many people pretend to know much about Hatha Yoga but don’t know where it comes from. I read that Gorakhnath was a major founder of hatha yoga. Can some one tell me when he lived and what he wrote? Does somebody know  when and by whom the Siva Samhita and Geranda Samhita were written? Thank you for your information, Irene. Before you buy.

Response:

The history of Hatha Yoga is usually associated with the Medieval India 7th-13th century where both yoga and tantra were blossoming. The historians call this the eclectic period  of the great Mahasiddhas  where many of the teachers no longer associated themselves with any "ism" or religion. This included Matysendranath who is generally considered to be the father of hatha yoga and whose disciple was Goraknath.  Matsyendranath is also considered to be the same mahasiddha Luipa and there is a temple outside Katmandu that is dedicated to him and which is both Hindu and Buddhist. This took place during a very  peaceful period of Indian history and which became severely disrupted during the many Mogul invasions in the 14-16th centuries wiping out Buddhism and much Yoga tantra from the Sub-Indian continent (many of it went to Tibet and Nepal where the Moslems did not go). It seems that Tibetan seekers came down to India since the 8th century for teachers/teachings and much of this yoga was then safely brought there. Thus most Tibetan yoga lineages trace their lineage to this time. Indian life was transformed by the invaders and most agree that its heyday was pre-invasion India. The surviving Nath Sect who takes Goraknath as their founder is a very watered down version of the yoga of this period (some say reformed). I have been told that it is almost impossible to find an existing competent Nath teacher (see "The Alchemical Body: Siddha Traditions in Medieval India"  by David Gordon White, Univ. of Chicago, 1996 for more.) Some classical texts are preserved in Tibetan (but Tibetan yogis are rare in the West and they do not readily teach this to beginners). Other texts such as the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Gherand Samhita, the Shat Karma Sangraha, the Gorakhpadhanti, The Goraksa-sataka, the Siva Samhita, and the Gherand Samhita are available in English by various translators. These vary in date from the 15th century to 18th century and give the general practices of the shat karmas, asana, pranayama, mudra, bandha, concentration (dharana) and meditation (dhyana) in order to achieve samadhi. Most  of then deal with balancing the pranas in the ida/pingala and bringing the energy in harmony so that it flows in a special non-dual way in the core psychic nerve called sushumna. The texts agree on this awakening (called kundalini) which is to be done gradually over time through consistent practice. There exist  a few other hatha yoga texts that are available in English translation. see George Feuerstein’s,  "The Yoga Tradition". See http://www.hubcom.com/tantric/ for more Nath texts in translation on the web. Also http://www.parkline.ru/Library/win/URIKOVA/SANTEM/SVATMARAMA/hyp.txt had the complete English translation of  the hatha yoga Pradipika, but right now it seems to be down. Swami Sivananda’s translation of the Yoga Kundalini Upanishad can be found on http://www.sivanandadlshq.org/download/download.htm The entire corpus of works called the "Yoga Upanishads" have also been translated into English (which deal with these same practices). For more see:  Yoga : Mastering Secrets of Matter and the Universe by Alain Danielou. Please take this as a brief sketch. there are books in English that are written about this period, Goraknath, etc should you be interested further.

Response:

Yoga and Snowboarding –

Question:

Awesome. I seem to be on the right track . After surya namaskar i progress through trikonasana utthita and parivrtta, then into some virabhadrasna and parsvakonasana utthita and parvrtta . Then some seated variations konasana, janu sirsasana, paschimottanasana, navasana and twists etc finishing with sarvangasana, halasana , fish, sirsasana and some bakasana type balancing then of course savasana.     The boardings coming along nicely, after three lessons and a bit of practice i’m neearly linking turns and controling toe edge heel edge and into fakie. Focus on the horizon…. — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? I was thinking virabhadrasna, prasarita padottanasana, adho mukha svanasana, and natarajasana for some balance hmmmm interesting. Any recipies? I’m no instructor but I remember when I was snowboarding I had tightness in my lower back, as well being fairly muscle bound in the gluts and hamstrings.  Forward bends would help create more agility by loosening the lower back and hamstrings.  I was thinking recently that doing back bends might help you get used to that same sort of flexibility that you need for methods.  That’s me. — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

Response:

Hi Justin To snowboard you need good flexibility plus strength and endurance. To start I would begin with sayur namaskar [sun salutes] to warm your body and buiuld strength. If your fitness is good you could also link the standing poses to follow with salutes. I reccommend any of the standing poses for endurance. Make sure you add some of the twisting standing poses such as parvrtta trikonasana and parvrtta parsva konasana for flexibility of the spine. A handstand helps to build stamina too, so if you know how throw one in after the standing poses. Add some floor poses such as pashimottanasana [bent or straight legs depending on the flexibilty of your hamstrings], baddha konasana, janu sirsasana and malasana [squat]. Then a few back bending movements. Maybe start with salabhasana and follow with setu bandasana or urdhva danurasana [full back arch]. Finish with a cross legged twist and a short savasana. Enjoy. Soo – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? I was thinking virabhadrasna, prasarita padottanasana, adho mukha svanasana, and natarajasana for some balance hmmmm interesting. Any recipies? — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

Response:

As an aside, I’ve visited the Kripalu Yoga centre in New York state. So they send me the catalogue of courses every six months or so.  They have a yoga and skiing course.  In the long term if your interested in checking this out, you’d probably get lots of ideas about blending the "sports".  Cheers, — Colette Le Fort

Response:

Cheers,     I’m friends with a local Yoga Master who has experience of  training snowboarders, what a stroke of luck.     Wow yoga is amazing — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – As an aside, I’ve visited the Kripalu Yoga centre in New York state. So they send me the catalogue of courses every six months or so.  They have a yoga and skiing course.  In the long term if your interested in checking this out, you’d probably get lots of ideas about blending the "sports". Cheers, — Colette Le Fort

Response:

Big up Charles,     Last night i had my third lesson and very nearly linked the turns, i don’t know if your in UK but i’m practicing at Hillingdon dry slope. This is a new adventure for me, my passion for spontaneous sadhana is thriving.    Thanks for your advice, Flow, groove, centered in the zone haha — what a buzz!

Justin–wait ’til you rip some turns in 30+ cms. of fresh powder.  Then you’ll discover Snow Yoga (is there a Sanskrit word for snow anyone?)

Response:

What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? I was thinking virabhadrasna, prasarita padottanasana, adho mukha svanasana, and natarajasana for some balance hmmmm interesting. Any recipies?

        I’m no instructor but I remember when I was snowboarding I had tightness in my lower back, as well being fairly muscle bound in the gluts and hamstrings.  Forward bends would help create more agility by loosening the lower back and hamstrings.  I was thinking recently that doing back bends might help you get used to that same sort of flexibility that you need for methods.  That’s me. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

Response:

Definately the Face Down Dog, paschimottanasana, reverse triangle(Parivrtta Trikonasana) and warrior 1,2,3.     And plenty more to open the hips and strengthen the knees like Baddha Konasana , Gomukhasana ,Utkatasana(fierce, powerful pose) like sitting on an imaginary chair.. — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reckon all the calf-stretching ones like reverse triangle, warrior 1, etc, but would like more ideas, especially if I can’t get hold of that book. Have six weeks before I go skiing!

Response:

Big up Charles,     Last night i had my third lesson and very nearly linked the turns, i don’t know if your in UK but i’m practicing at Hillingdon dry slope. This is a new adventure for me, my passion for spontaneous sadhana is thriving.    Thanks for your advice, Flow, groove, centered in the zone haha — what a buzz! — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? Justin, you may well have already considered this, but I’d add any asana that allows you to get really centered, really interiorized so that when you strap on the board you can get into the flow, into the groove. I’ve found that some pranayam while riding the chair really helps me get into the zone, and then when I get to the top and I’m ready to go, I’m There. cheers, charles

Response:

I reckon all the calf-stretching ones like reverse triangle, warrior 1, etc, but would like more ideas, especially if I can’t get hold of that book. Have six weeks before I go skiing!

Response:

I bought a book off eBay recently, entitled "Skiing and Yoga", circa 1972, but for Snowboarding maybe you need "Surfing and Yoga". –LMM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? I was thinking virabhadrasna, prasarita padottanasana, adho mukha svanasana, and natarajasana for some balance hmmmm interesting. Any recipies?

Response:

What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders? I was thinking virabhadrasna, prasarita padottanasana, adho mukha svanasana, and natarajasana for some balance hmmmm interesting. Any recipies? — — peace be the journey — http://home.freeuk.net/justin.horth

Response:

What asanas would you say would be good for snowboarders?

Justin, you may well have already considered this, but I’d add any asana that allows you to get really centered, really interiorized so that when you strap on the board you can get into the flow, into the groove. I’ve found that some pranayam while riding the chair really helps me get into the zone, and then when I get to the top and I’m ready to go, I’m There. cheers, charles

Response: